IP: brooklyn iling on CDA

[Dave Farber <farber@central.cis.upenn.edu>]

And the text of the separate complaint filed in Brooklyn today
challenging the CDA provisions restricting online speech about
abortion may be found at


  http://www.cais.com/agm/telecomp.htm


A link at the same site indicates that the U.S. Attorney for the
District conceded at this morning's hearing that the challenged
provision is unconstitutional.



-- 
"'On April 26, 1968, the defendant was observed in the Los Angeles County
Courthouse ... wearing a jacket bearing the words "Fuck the Draft" which were
plainly visible.  There were women and children present in the corridor.'"
Cohen v. California, 403 US 15, 16 (1971)  ||  Mark Eckenwiler eck@panix.com


and I looked up and added the following (why should I trust the next US
Attorney? djf


Department of Justice Pledges Not To Enforce Abortion Language (February 8,
1996) 


     At a hearing to consider a temporary restraining order, the U.S.
Attorney stated that the Department of Justice will not prosecute violations
of the new abortion information restrictions.