[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: IP: Dern vs Metcalfe vs crypto-bioflavinoids
From: ddern@world.std.com (Daniel P Dern) Speaking as the person who actually wrote the "Internet collapsing?" article that starts on page 1 of this week's (July 1 96) InfoWorld, let me toss a few facts into the ole cyberhopper, ere more pre-informed speculation re-overwhelms this list. (One quick disclaimer, first: I just got my copy of InfoWorld, and have read it only enough to see that it starts on page 1 <yum> and that they got my name and email correct in the bio tag...and that Bob MetCalfe got to do a related/rebutting piece that ran alongside the final page of my article. I.e., I haven't read what ran, and therefore don't know whether what ran is identical to, or changed some/lots from, the last version I saw from my editor.) The article I wrote (see above) did its best to examine the issues, concerns, and solutions for the realities of continually growing demands for bandwidth, loads on web sites, and new classes of applications that would/might not work good|well|at all over "Internet classic" -- i.e., best-effort delivery with no bandwidth reservation or guarantee. My information came from a mix of a) re-reading the 140+ postings of the original 'Metcalfe sez the cybersky is falling' thread from com-priv. <oy>, b) discussions with net folks in a position to know, including Vint Cerf, Doug Humphrey (Digex), John Curran (BBN), Scott Bradner, Robert Raisch (The Internet Company), John Quarterman (TIC/MIDS), Robert Moskowitz (Chrysler), etc. I also -- with permission and revision -- worked from some people's postings in the com-priv-fest. As I'd hope most of you out there know, I've been using and writing about the Internet for over a decade. (You can see my sorely-in-need- of-updating web page for more gory detail.) While you don't have to agree with my conclusions, kindly don't flame me, InfoWorld, or Bob Metcalfe until you at least read the furshlugginer article. I don't consider my article to be the final word on the topic; indeed, it raises lots of good questions and issues there wasn't room to pursue, even in the extra length I was allowed. (<Wink wink, nudge nudge> to any editors out there </wink></nudge>.) Now go read the actual article before jumping to any (more) conclusions! (Dunno if it's online. If it is, please *don't* post the text, just an URL...respect InfoWorld's copyright.) Bio-anarchistically and bioflavinoidally, DPD Daniel Dern (ddern@world.std.com, http://www.dern.com) Internet analyst, author, columnist & speaker (617) 969-7947 FAX: (617) 969-7949
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC