[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: IP: ICANN -- New IANA
From: requested anonymity Subject: Re: ICANN To: farber@cis.upenn.edu Dave - one of the interesting ironies of the ICANN organizational documents is that the added "protections" of the 4th and hopefully consensus draft will clearly drive the Board in the direction of a quasi-governmental body working at all times with counsel present and giving advice/marching orders. Ie, like the FCC we've all said we wanted to avoid at all costs. See, for instance, new text in Art III section 4 on reconsideration, and section 3 (b)(ii) on comments and reply comments. Sounds suspiciously like the process of our (un)favorite regulatory agency. Yours in resisting entropy. - Xxxxx
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC