[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: IP: AOL to Compete in Assigning Internet Domains
http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/99/04/cyber/articles/22domain.html
April 22, 1999
AOL to Compete in Assigning Internet Domains
By JERI CLAUSING
ASHINGTON -- America Online, the world's largest online service, was
one of five companies chosen Wednesday to compete with Network
Solutions Inc., which currently enjoys a Government-backed monopoly in
the lucrative business of assigning the Internet addresses known as
domains.
While the surprising choice of America Online introduced a seemingly
formidable competitor to the business of assigning Internet addresses,
its selection nonetheless raised new questions about the ability of
smaller companies to ever effectively compete in this much-coveted
marketplace.
"It's unfortunate," said Dave Farber, a professor of computer science
at the University of Pennsylvania and a board member of the Internet
civil liberties group the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "I think it
was a good opportunity to spread the wealth. Now you get AOL against
NSI, and they can have a ball."
The other four companies selected in this first round -- it will be
opened to many more companies this summer -- were Register.com, a
comparatively small New York-based domain name reseller; a subsidiary
of France Telecom; Melbourne IT of Australia and the Internet Council
of Registrars, an international consortium that helped lead the
movement to break Network Solution's monopoly.
The selection of the five registrars was the first major action taken
by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or Icann,
the nonprofit corporation established last year by the Clinton
Administration to move management of the Internet from government
contractors to the private sector with international oversight.
Since 1994, Network Solutions has had an exclusive right to assign
companies and individuals Internet addresses in the so-called
top-level domains -- those ending in the suffixes .com, .net and .org.
Breaking that monopoly was among the top priorities of Icann when it
was organized last November.
At a news conference today, Icann's interim chairman, Esther Dyson,
characterized the move as "a major milestone in the joint efforts of
the public and private sectors to bring Internet users the benefits of
real competition."
But just how much competition the new companies will offer Network
Solutions remains to be seen, since the company will retain its hold
on the Internet registry, the central database of all Internet
addresses already assigned. And under Icann's rules, competitors will
have to pay Network Solutions a $9-a-year fee for access to the
registry -- far more than the administration costs, critics contend.
The companies also will have to pay Network Solutions a $10,000 fee up
front to help cover the costs of the software it developed to enable
others to add registrations to its database.
Commerce Department officials have been wrangling with the company
over several difficult issues, including what portions of the
databases and software built by Network Solutions as a Government
contractor are now public and which are private property.
In the seven years since it was granted an exclusive Government
contract to build the database and registry system, Network Solutions
has transformed itself into a Fortune 500 company, offering a variety
of registration services and establishing registry partnerships all
over the world.
Wall Street was unfazed Wednesday by the threat of competition from
America Online. Network Solutions' stock, which had lost half its
value over the last few weeks, closed at 92 -- 32 points higher than
Tuesday's close, a better than 53 percent gain.
"The economic reality is that Network Solutions has all the market
movement in its favor, and there's nothing Icann or the Government can
do to really unseat Network Solutions," said Keith Benjamin, an
Internet analyst with Banc Boston Robertson Stephens in San Francisco.
"They have a crucial relationship with essentially every Internet
service provider on the planet."
And despite the name recognition and wealth of America Online,
Benjamin said, "This is a business that AOL is not going to be easily
suited for. They cater to a consumer market, so it is a little
confusing why AOL is doing this."
Dyson said the board intentionally picked a large company, a small
company and interests representing different business models and
regions of the world to make sure that different companies could all
interact and effectively compete.
In addition to the five test-bed participants, ICANN announced that 29
applicants, including AT&T, had met its accreditation criteria and
were expected to be certified to compete when the system is opened to
unlimited competition this summer.
Network Solutions put a positive spin on today's announcement, noting
that it already had more than 5 million customers and millions of
still-unassigned names to compete for.
Christopher Clough, a spokesman for the company, called the
competition "good for everyone," but added: "Obviously, we have a head
start. We have the most established company. We have the world's
leading experts on the domain-name system,"
Alluding to the fees competitors will have to pay for access to the
registry, he noted that Network Solutions was not only "taking on five
new competitors but five new customers."
Bill Burrington, America Online's vice president for policy, agreed.
He said his company had applied to become a registrar because it saw
the opportunity to create a new "value-added service." But he
emphasized that "it's too early to say how the process will play out."
"This is all new," he said. "We are doing this on the fly -- in
Internet time," Burrington said. "We don't know where this is all
going."
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC