[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: IP: re:: The rule of the mob
> >Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 14:39:45 -0400 >To: farber@cis.upenn.edu >From: "Richard J. Solomon" <rsolomon@dsl.cis.upenn.edu> > > >Perhaps our IP readers should reflect on what grounds U.S. governments have >rights to regulate anything. The Internet is not like radio and television >broadcasting which use scarce electromagnetic spectrum, nor does it use >public rights of way directly. As content, it is very difficult to justify >Net regulations under "public convenience and necessity" right-of-way >precepts; & the First Amendment lays down some fundamental principles which >the Courts take very seriously about government interference in >communications per se -- currently being further defined via the CDA >litigation. So, no matter what the polls say today, any regulation of >content on the Net will move very slowly if at all. That's why we have a >constitution in the first place. \ > >Richard > > >At 4:43 AM -0400 5/4/99, Dave Farber wrote: > >>Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 23:20:32 -0400 > >>From: David Rosensweig <dlrosens@sas.upenn.edu> > >>Organization: University of Pennsylvania > >>X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; U) > >>X-Accept-Language: en > >>To: farber@cis.upenn.edu > >>Subject: regulating internet content > >> > >>here are some discouraging numbers: > >> > >>According to the latest CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll, 65 percent say the > >>federal government should do more to regulate violence on the Internet; > >>12 percent say the government should do less to regulate violence on the > >>Internet and 17 percent say that the government is doing the right > >>amount to regulate violence on the Internet. > >> > >>http://cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1999/05/03/media.poll/ > >> > >>unfortunately, not enough people realize the following, from a recent IP > >>email: > >> > >> >The point to remember is that basic constitutional principles do not > >> > arise and disappear as each new technology comes on the scene. We > >> > have come to this conclusion rather slowly. > >> > >>the following is quote is from a friend: > >> > >>" Otherwise, Government becomes based on the whims of the majority, the > >>same > >>way that the tv entertainment industry relies upon ratings to determine > >>the > >>course of the tv show. Would you want a government based on ratings?" > >> > >>and lastly, an NPR story on a student being expelled from school for > >>expressing his displeasure with people who've beat him up. what kid > >>wouldn't be displeased? > >> http://www.npr.org/ramfiles/atc/19990503.atc.04.ram > >> > >>david
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC