[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: IP: Gore on kids; Internet surveillance; more on FCC & filters
> >From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com> > >http://www.wired.com/news/news/politics/story/19505.html > > Click Here for Safe Surfing > by Declan McCullagh > > 3:00 a.m. 5.May.99.PDT > WASHINGTON -- It didn't take > Washington politicians very long to > respond to reports that the Littleton, > Colorado, killers had their own Web sites. > Last week top Justice Department official > Eric Holder said he'd like to see new > "regulations" controlling how Americans > use the Internet, and President Clinton > warned of its dangers. > > On Wednesday, Vice President Gore will > unveil the White House's latest response > to the shooting. > [...snip...] > > >http://www.wired.com/news/news/politics/story/19504.html > > But one document distributed at the > event worries privacy advocates. It says > the money for SEC enforcement "will > specifically help the commission increase > Internet surveillance [and] augment > training for law enforcement." > > >Date: Tue, 4 May 1999 20:56:17 -0400 >To: "Colin A. Reed" <aleph@alumni.caltech.edu>, Declan McCullagh ><declan@well.com> >From: Marc Rotenberg <rotenberg@epic.org> > >I was there and I questioned Kennard after he spoke. > >There is no doubt that the FCC Commissioner is actively promoting >filters. He began his comments on the topic by noting that >the Annenberg report released today at the National Press Club >found that only a 1/3 of parents were using filters. Kennard said >that the government should work to ensure that many more parents are >using filters. He said that the FCC is launching a web site to >provide parents with information about using filters. He also said >that he would support filters as a condition for e-rate funding for >schools and libraries. > >During the Q&A, I said to Kennard that EPIC and many other >organizations had found loads of problems with filters. They >are overinclusive. They are underinclusive. They are an >imperfect solution. I suggested that at the very least the >FCC could provide links to the various reports that show >the problems with filters so that parents and others could be >more fully informed about the consequences of using these >techniques. Kennard said that this was a "good suggestion" and >he would consider it. > >Incidentally, ALA President Ann Symons gave a very good talk >at lunch. She said that the ALA opposes the use of filters >that block access to constitutionally protected speech. (Her >own library contains 60 terminals without filters. Support >the ALA.) > >I spoke at the end of the day and suggested for the next >study on what parents are afraid of that the Annenberg >Center ask parents to rate the following items in terms >of how dangerous they are to their children: > > - Books > - Computer terminals with Internet access > - Bicycles > - Cars > - Motorcycles > - Household cleaning fluids > - Alcohol > - Tobacco > - Handguns > >I also suggested that they ask these same parents where >their children would be most safe: > > - Behind a computer keyboard > - Behind the steering wheel of a car > - In a bar > - At a rock concert > - At a place unknown > >More information at the Internet Free Expression Alliance >site (www.ifea.net). > >Marc Rotenberg >EPIC. > > > >-------------------------------------------------------------------------- >POLITECH -- the moderated mailing list of politics and technology >To subscribe: send a message to majordomo@vorlon.mit.edu with this text: >subscribe politech >More information is at http://www.well.com/~declan/politech/ >--------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC