[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: IP: When Will We Have to Opt Out Daily?
> >Date: Fri, 03 Dec 1999 14:35:18 -0500 >To: David Farber <farber@cis.upenn.edu> >From: "Lance J. Hoffman" <hoffman@seas.gwu.edu> >Subject: When Will We Have to Opt Out Daily? > >Dave, >The story below depicts, pretty accurately, a time-based privacy breach by >AOL (who should know better). I checked it out with someone in a position >at AOL, and the story is essentially accurate. It appears that with AOL, >"no" does not mean "no" (and they even tell you that in the fine print). >It's a pretty outrageous practice that brings the bad old practices of the >pre-Internet age to today. IP-ers might be intersted in it. > >Lance > > >AOL To Users: Opt Out Again >By Doug Brown, >By Doug Brown, Inter@ctive Week >November 29, 1999 9:28 AM ET > >An America Online policy is again putting privacy issues on the front >burner. The nation's leading access provider recently started sending >e-mails to customers informing them that the privacy preferences they signed >up for a year ago - the ones telling the company not to collect or >distribute information about their accounts or online habits - have >"expired." > >AOL said that if subscribers want their preferences to remain in place, they >must again fill out what is known as an "opt out" form. If they do nothing, >information about their accounts and Web habits may be distributed to >marketers and other interested parties. > >The preferences' one-year life span is part of a much-publicized privacy >policy that AOL put in place a year ago, said Andrew Weinstein, a spokesman >at AOL. He defended the policy, saying that the company explained "to >consumers in detail exactly how [the preferences] will work. They work on a >one-year basis. If they want to receive materials after that, they are given >the ability to do that." > >But privacy advocates evaluate the new policy differently. They said most >AOL users are surprised to learn they have to redo their opt-out >preferences. > >David Sobel, general counsel at privacy advocacy group Electronic Privacy >Information Cente, said AOL's new approach to privacy is appalling, but not >surprising. It also could mark a step backward for the industry's attempts >to anoint "opting out" the only privacy solution in the online world. > >"I think that if we get to the point of having a serious congressional >examination of this issue, it will be shown that 'opt out' is not adequate," >Sobel said. "I would show as exhibit 'A' the kind of thing that AOL is >sending out. Not only will they bother you once, but it will become a >constant job to keep saying 'no.' " > >Sobel favors legislation to deal with the collection and sale of personal >online information. Industry, on the other hand, promotes self-regulation as >the only way to protect privacy without setting up e-commerce roadblocks. > >For consumers, opting out means, generally, filling out a form - either >online or on paper - stating an unwillingness to have personal information >distributed. Users can opt out of lists used for sending spam e-mail, having >logs of their online travels sold to marketers or having information about >what they buy online disseminated. > >The concept has gathered momentum in Washington, D.C. The Federal Trade >Commission recently sponsored a daylong conference that explored the >practice of harvesting and selling data about users' online habits and ways >to deal with it, including opting out. There are also several House bills >pushing opting out as a way to help ensure consumer privacy. > >But privacy advocates generally oppose opting out, saying the practice is a >smokescreen for businesses more than anything else. Consumers must remain >constantly vigilant to keep their online activities out of the marketing >loop when the burden, they argue, should instead be placed upon industry. > >"You're in the world, not your living room," said Sydney Rubin, a >spokeswoman at the Online Privacy Alliance, an industry coalition that >promotes privacy standards from an industry perspective. "You have to read >the privacy policies and then choose whether or not to shop at a site." > > > > >Lance J. Hoffman, Director, Cyberspace Policy Institute >and Professor, Dept. of Computer Science, The George Washington University, >Washington DC 20052. Phone (202) 994-5513 Fax (202) 994-5505. >http://www.seas.gwu.edu/seas/institutes/cpi/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC