[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: IP: UK Regulation of Investigatory Power (RIP) bill published
>\Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 00:24 +0000 (GMT) >From: wendyg@cix.compulink.co.uk (Wendy Grossman) > >I haven't seen anything about this on the list, so FYI: > >Last Thursday, the UK government, specifically the Home Office, >published the Regulation of Investigatory Powers (RIP) bill. This >contains updates to a variety of legislation designed to give police >powers to wiretap, surveill, etc. WRT crypto, it contains the clauses >regarding the requirement for people to produce keys to decrypt >information if notified to do so that were deleted from the Electronic >Communications (formerly Electronic Commerce) bill. These clauses >failed a Human Rights audit commissioned by the Foundation for >Information Policy Research because they essentially shift the burden of >proof onto the (presumed) innocent. In addition, the bill would require >ISPs to install equipment to allow monitoring of their customers. > >The bill is at >http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199900/cmbills/064/2000064.htm > >Foundation for Information Policy Research's analysis is at >http://www.fipr.org > >The Campaign Against Censorship of the Internet in Britain's comments >are at >http://www.liberty.org.uk/cacib/artview.php3?currentgroup=0&pid=77&type=n >ews > >I should have a news story in the Telegraph on Thursday >(http://www.telegraph.co.uk) > >wg
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC