[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: IP: RE: A report on the WHite House meeting by Gene Stafford
>From: "David Newman" <dnewman@networktest.com> >To: <farber@cis.upenn.edu> >Cc: <spaf@cerias.purdue.edu> > > > > One estimate in one news source speculated > > that over > > >a billion dollars had been lost in lost revenue, downtime, and > > >preventative measures. I'm skeptical of that, but it certainly is the > > >case that a significant loss occurred. > >I'm very skeptical of that figure too. One possible way to gauge the costs >is to take the most recently quarterly revenue of the attacked companies; >divide by the number of hours in a quarter; and multiply by the number of >hours they were off the air. > >Not claiming this is anything but a rough estimation (or even a valid way to >figure it), but if we do use this method for six big victims -- Amazon, >Buy.com, E*trade, eBay, Yahoo!, and ZDnet -- the total outage resulted less >than $1 million, with an M, in lost revenue. And some of these folks (like >ZDnet) have non-Internet revenue, so the actual loss may be lower. > >It may be possible to tilt the scales the other way by noting that online >brokerage Datek was hit. Their revenue figures are private, but the numbers >might be larger than any of these. I rather doubt they lost $1 billion in an >afternoon, though. > >Thanks to Techweb's Mo Krochmal for pointing out this very easy way to >figure loss. > >David Newman >Network Test > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC