[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: IP: Leap Year 2000 Explained
>Date: Tue, 29 Feb 2000 13:34:32 -0800 >From: Gary Delp <gdelp@siara.com> >To: Dave Farber <farber@cis.upenn.edu> >Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: Leap Year 2000 Explained]] > > >-------- Original Message -------- >Subject: death_to_vms >Date: Wed, 24 Mar 1999 08:28:12 -0800 > >The year 2000 is a leap year. > >Some years ago, a Digital employee called Stan Rabinowitz was called >upon to answer a customer's complaint that VMS "incorrectly" handled >the year 2000 as a leap year. His extremely thorough response has >since become quite famous in VMS circles, as it is probably the only >SPR response to mention Sosigenes, Regiomontanus and the Council of >Trent. The following is the original draft of this response, although >how it left Digital is a matter of some conjecture. Digital >management made him remove the references to radio station WWV, atomic >clocks and VMS V4 before sending it to the customer. > >It has been reformatted slightly for easy viewing. > >D I G I T A L >SPR Answer Form >SPR NO. 11-60903 >System Version Product Version Component >Software VAX/VMS V3.2 VAX/VMS V3.2 Run-Time Library > >PROBLEM: >The LIB$DAY Run-Time Library service "incorrectly" assumes the year >2000 is a leap year. > >RESPONSE: >Thank you for your forward-looking SPR. > >Various system services, such as SYS$ASCTIM assume that the year 2000 >will be a leap year. Although one can never be sure of what will >happen at some future time, there is strong historical precedent for >presuming that the present Gregorian calendar will still be in effect >by the year 2000. Since we also hope that VMS will still be around by >then, we have chosen to adhere to these precedents. The purpose of a >calendar is to reckon time in advance, to show how many days have to >elapse until a certain event takes place in the future, such as the >harvest or the release of VMS V4. The earliest calendars, naturally, >were crude and tended to be based upon the seasons or the lunar cycle. > >The calendar of the Assyrians, for example, was based upon the phases >of the moon. They knew that a lunation (the time from one full moon >to the next) was 29 1/2 days long, so their lunar year had a duration >of 354 days. This fell short of the solar year by about 11 days. >(The exact time for the solar year is approximately 365 days, 5 hours, >48 minutes, and 46 seconds.) After 3 years, such a lunar calendar >would be off by a whole month, so the Assyrians added an extra month >from time to time to keep their calendar in synchronization with the >seasons. > >The best approximation that was possible in antiquity was a 19-year >period, with 7 of these 19 years having 13 months (leap months). This >scheme was adopted as the basis for the religious calendar used by the >Jews. (The Arabs also used this calendar until Mohammed forbade >shifting from 12 months to 13 months.) > >When Rome emerged as a world power, the difficulties of making a >calendar were well known, but the Romans complicated their lives >because of their superstition that even numbers were unlucky. Hence >their months were 29 or 31 days long, with the exception of February, >which had 28 days. Every second year, the Roman calendar included an >extra month called Mercedonius of 22 or 23 days to keep up with the >solar year. > >Even this algorithm was very poor, so that in 45 BC, Caesar, advised >by the astronomer Sosigenes, ordered a sweeping reform. By imperial >decree, one year was made 445 days long to bring the calendar back in >step with the seasons. The new calendar, similar to the one we now >use, was called the Julian calendar (named after Julius Caesar). Its >months were 30 or 31 days in length and every fourth year was made a >leap year (having 366 days). Caesar also decreed that the year would >start with the first of January, not the vernal equinox in late March. > >Caesar's year was 11 1/2 minutes short of the calculations recommended >by Sosigenes and eventually the date of the vernal equinox began to >drift. Roger Bacon became alarmed and sent a note to Pope Clement IV, >who apparently was not impressed. Pope Sixtus IV later became >convinced that another reform was needed and called the German >astronomer, Regiomontanus, to Rome to advise him. Unfortunately, >Regiomontanus died of the plague shortly thereafter and the plans died >as well. > >In 1545, the Council of Trent authorized Pope Gregory XIII to reform >the calendar once more. Most of the mathematical work was done by >Father Christopher Clavius, S.J. The immediate correction that was >adopted was that Thursday, October 4, 1582 was to be the last day of >the Julian calendar. The next day was Friday, with the date of >October 15. > >For long range accuracy, a formula suggested by the Vatican librarian >Aloysius Giglio was adopted. It said that every fourth year is a leap >year except for century years that are not divisible by 400. Thus >1700, 1800 and 1900 would not be leap years, but 2000 would be a leap >year since 2000 is divisible by 400. This rule eliminates 3 leap >years every 4 centuries, making the calendar sufficiently correct for >most ordinary purposes. This calendar is known as the Gregorian >calendar and is the one that we now use today. (It is interesting to >note that in 1582, all the Protestant princes ignored the papal decree >and so many countries continued to use the Julian calendar until >either 1698 or 1752. In Russia, it needed the revolution to introduce >the Gregorian calendar in 1918.) > >This explains why VMS chooses to treat the year 2000 as a leap year. >Despite the great accuracy of the Gregorian calendar, it still falls >behind very slightly every few years. If you are very concerned about >this problem, we suggest that you tune in short wave radio station >WWV, which broadcasts official time signals for use in the United >States. About once every 3 years, they declare a leap second at which >time you should be careful to adjust your system clock. If you have >trouble picking up their signals, we suggest you purchase an atomic >clock (not manufactured by Digital and not a VAX option at this time). >END OF SPR
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC