IP: IMPORTANT DO READ AND MAKE UP YOUR OWN MIND --Microsoft and other linking bans put journalists at risk

[Dave Farber <farber@cis.upenn.edu>]

>Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 03:21:20 -0400
>To: politech@vorlon.mit.edu
>From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
>
>
>Microsoft is demanding that Slashdot remove certain posts and *links* to 
>certain sites, including, apparently, areas of microsoft.com. The 
>lawyergram from Microsoft said:
>
>http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/05/11/0153247&mode=thread
>>"Included on http://www.slashdot.org are comments that now appear in 
>>your  Archives, which include unauthorized reproductions of Microsoft's 
>>copyrighted work... In addition, some comments include links to 
>>unauthorized reproductions of the Specification, and some comments 
>>contain instructions on how to circumvent the End User License Agreement."
>
>Microsoft claims such links are illegal under the Digital Millennium 
>Copyright Act. This creates a problem for journalists, who generally like 
>to provide links to ongoing controversies without spending an inordinate 
>amount of time in prison.
>
>Note Microsoft also wants to censor *discussions* of how to bypass the 
>license agreement, which might also reasonably appear in a news article, 
>but for now let's just focus on linking.
>
>Can I include links to offending sites in my articles? This is not an 
>academic question. I covered the /. controversy yesterday, which involves 
>allegations of Microsoft perverting open standards for its own gain, at: 
>http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,36282,00.html
>
>For instance, am I permitted to link to this copy of the supposedly 
>"secret" source code without risking a lawsuit? 
>http://nofuncharlie.com/archive/microkerb.txt
>
>Journalists in the past haven't worried about copyright law much at all; 
>if anything, we've instinctively supported it. Copyright law helps us to 
>get paid for what we do for a living.
>
>But nowadays intellectual property rights may have gone too far -- and are 
>interfering with free speech rights that are traditionally protected by 
>the First Amendment. If a web site somewhere on the Internet is violating 
>Microsoft's copyright, let Bill Gates' team of natty attorneys sue to take 
>it offline. But don't sue me and order me not to link to something that my 
>readers want to know about.
>
>It's no accident that Microsoft and Microsoft-funded trade associations 
>lobbied Congress to pass the Digital Millennium Copyright Act in the first 
>place.
>
>This isn't even the only case involving journalists and linking:
>
>* I received a copy of a temporary restraining order and a subpoena for 
>linking to a copy of a program that revealed Cyberpatrol's secret 
>blacklist: http://www.politechbot.com/p-01022.html
>
>* A bill before the House Judiciary committee would make it a crime in 
>some cases for anyone, including journalists, to link to drug-related web 
>sites: http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,36209,00.html
>
>* The motion picture industry has asked a federal judge to order 2600 
>Magazine to delete links to a program that decrypts DVDs: 
>http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,35394,00.html 2600's attorney 
>correctly pointed out that other news sites such as Wired link to the same 
>program and would be at risk: 
>http://www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,36131,00.html I linked to the 
>DeCSS utility in a number of my articles, as did other reporters.
>
>Last year, I warned that "journalists should pay attention" because news 
>sites could be sued in linking cases: 
>http://www.politechbot.com/p-00814.html Now that Microsoft has upped the 
>ante by taking on Slashdot -- a new form of community journalism that just 
>won a people's choice Webby Award -- that outcome seems even more likely.
>
>I'm copying two Microsoft representatives. Perhaps they can assure me for 
>the record that my fears are unfounded.
>
>-Declan
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>POLITECH -- the moderated mailing list of politics and technology
>To subscribe, visit http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
>This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------