[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: IP: RE: G-8 OFFICIALS CONSIDER TREATY FOR CYBERCRIME LAWS
I will let the readers determine whether the actions of many have been trying to undermine the BofR. Dave >From: "Baker, Stewart" <SBaker@steptoe.com> >To: "'farber@cis.upenn.edu'" <farber@cis.upenn.edu> >cc: "Albertazzie, Sally" <SAlbertazzie@steptoe.com> > > >[ I wonder if the law they say " U.S. law enforcement groups are also >hamstrung by laws that allow cybercriminals to escape detection and >capture." is also called the Bill of Rights djf] > > >That's not fair, Dave. I don't know any Justice officials who would >criticize the Bill of Rights as hamstringing law enforcement. More likely >this is a reference to the lack of procedures for a nationwide "trap and >trace" order that would allow the government to track hackers from one US >host to another without having to get a separate order in a local court for >each host. It's fair to ask questions about this Justice proposal, but I >haven't heard anyone argue that it violates the Bill of Rights. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC