IP: Microsoft[0] and Microsoft[1]

[Dave Farber <farber@cis.upenn.edu>]

I believe andy has it right djf
>From: "Andy Oram" <andyo@oreilly.com>
>To: "\"Dave Farber\"" <farber@cis.upenn.edu>
>
>(For IP list, if you find it interesting.)
>
>
>While I wouldn't trust an investment analyst with a piece of play money from
>a Monopoly set, it's interesting what they're saying about the prospects of
>Microsoft[0] and Microsoft[1] should the company be broken up:
>
>http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-2031629.html
>Microsoft investors face split decision
>
>The gist is that they'd put their money on the applications company and let
>the operating system company shrivel up. Wasn't Windows 2000 supposed to be
>a great platform?
>
>I can't help mentioning my own article, at the end of which I speculate on
>what could have happened if Jackson had pushed through his proposed
>three-way split:
>
>http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/network/2000/06/01/outbox.html
>Thinking Outside the Outbox
>
>Andy