[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: IP: \Testing criminals, teachers, students,rockets
[second the motion djf] >Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2000 13:16:56 -0400 >To: Dave Farber <farber@cis.upenn.edu> >From: Jock Gill <jgill@e-greenstar.com> >Subject: Testing criminals, teachers, students,rockets > >Dave, > >I suppose it is too much to ask that we apply uniform testing standards >for criminals [three strikes], teachers [tenure challenges]; students >[pass a test to graduate] and rockets [missile defense comes tomind]. > >If we allow the military/industrial complex to "fudge" tests and their >results, then how can anyone expect us to hold anyone else to a higher >standard? Do you suppose the proponents of a so called missile defense >proposal would so staunchly defend the rights of teachers, students and >criminals to set up doctored, dumbed down tests and then combine all right >answers from all failed tests to form an aggregate passing score? > >Isn't Q`2§American way a fair and square testing procedure uniformly and >symmetrically applied where what is good for the goose is good for the >gander? If not, what meaning has the 'rule of law'? > >Perhaps the pentagon has done us a favor by exposing the hypocrisy >surrounding our mania for testing. > >Best regards, > >Jock >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC