IP: Building owners access proposal

[Dave Farber <farber@cis.upenn.edu>]

>
>From: David Lesher <wb8foz@NRK.COM>
>Subject:      Building owners access proposal
>To: CYBERTELECOM-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
>
>http://www.nwfusion.com/edge/columnists/2000/1218edge2.html
>
>Real estate groups propose model carrier/building contract
>
>By DAVID ROHDE
>The Edge, 12/21/00
>
>The touchy issue of contracts between competitive carriers and
>commercial building owners is back on the table, thanks to a new
>"Model License Agreement" proposed by the real estate industry.
>
>Building contracts have been a hotly contested issue the last
>couple of years because of two key developments.  The first
>was the rise of fixed-wireless carriers, who needed access to
>building risers and rooftops and felt some commercial landlords
>were shutting them out.
>
>{}
>
>But the FCC also warned the real estate industry that it would
>continue to monitor the development of competitive in-building
>telecom services and reconsider those stiffer rules if
>warranted.
>
>............
>
>
>========================
>
>I can see this is another hot potato for the Portals. In another
>form {zoning rules & CC&R's on resit property than ban antennas}
>it's been around a while & getting worse....
>
>Without access rights of some kind, monopoly control will be a
>fact of life.
>
>
>
>
>--
>A host is a host from coast to coast.................wb8foz@nrk.com
>& no one will talk to a host that's close........[v].(301) 56-LINUX
>Unless the host (that isn't close).........................pob 1433
>is busy, hung or dead....................................20915-1433



For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/