[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: IP: AU IP Lawyers comment on Australian government statement on email-forwarding flap
>From: "Hunter, Dan" <hunterd@wharton.upenn.edu> >To: "'David Farber'" <dave@farber.net> >Subject: Australian government statement on email-forwarding flap >Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2001 08:41:16 -0500 > >Dave: > >Feel free to share this. > >Dan >--------------------- > >As an Australian, and an IP lawyer, I am qualified to comment on the >article. It's garbage, and it's stupid garbage. The Australian Act >doesn't say this, and won't be interpreted like this. The Act is broadly >consistent with the US DMCA, which itself stems out of the WIPO >Treaty. Each of these Acts|Treaties were intended to "update" copyright >law, to bring it into the digital age. > >I agree that the anti-circumvention provisions in each Act are >problematic, though not nearly as serious as everyone on this list would >think (and not nearly as serious as the EFF would make out). > >Oh, and as for the idea that "Australians don't have First Amendment >rights", can I just say that this may be true, but guess what? In relation >to the DMCA anticircumvention neither do US citizens. Or have we all not >been following Emmanuel Goldstein's slight problems? > >Dan. > >_________________________________________________ >Dr Dan Hunter >The Wharton School >University of Pennsylvania >_________________________________________________ > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: David Farber [mailto:dave@farber.net] > > Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 5:39 PM > > To: Hunter, Dan > > Subject: Fwd: [E-PRV] FC: Australian government statement on > > email-forwarding flap (fwd) > > > > > > > > >X-Authentication-Warning: va.eff.org: mdomo-sy set sender to > > >owner-eff-priv@eff.org using -f > > >Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 12:57:37 -0800 (PST) > > >From: Henry Schwan <owlswan@va.eff.org> > > >To: eff-ip@va.eff.org, eff-privacy@va.eff.org > > >Subject: [E-PRV] FC: Australian government statement on > > email-forwarding > > >flap (fwd) > > >Sender: owner-eff-priv@eff.org > > >Reply-To: eff-priv@eff.org > > > > > >Best wishes, > > >Henry Schwan > > >owlswan@eff.org > > > > > >From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com> > > > > > >********** > > > > > >From: "Chalmers, Rachel" <Rachel.Chalmers@the451.com> > > >To: "'declan@well.com'" <declan@well.com> > > >Subject: RE: Forwarding email without permission now illegal > > in Australia > > >Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 09:38:36 -0800 > > > > > >Declan, > > > > > >The Australian Attorney-General has already responded to the > > >email-forwarding beatup: > > > > > >"Contrary to alarmist media reports, sharing e-mail is not > > banned by law. > > >Amendments to the Copyright Act that came into effect today > > do not outlaw > > >the practice of forwarding personal e-mails to other people. > > That would be > > >ridiculous." > > > > > >http://www.law.gov.au/aghome/agnews/2001newsag/931_01.htm > > > > > > > > >What he doesn't say is that the Digital Agenda Act contains the same > > >prohibition on copy protection circumvention as the DMCA - and that > > >Australians don't have a free speech defence. > > > > > >Rachel Chalmers, the451 > > For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC