interesting-people message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]


Subject: IP: NSF study: "Internet Voting is no 'Magic Ballot'": [risks] Risks Digest 21.28



>Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 14:24:58 -0800 (PST)
>From: Terry Carroll <carroll@tjc.com>
>Subject: NSF study: "Internet Voting is no 'Magic Ballot'"
>
>RISKS has previously had discussions of the risks associated with going to
>computerized voting (especially Internet-based voting) as an attempted
>panacea for the types of problems we saw in the last US presidential
>election.
>
>The National Science Foundation recently released a study that it
>commissioned from the Internet Policy Institute on problems associated
>with Internet voting.  The NSF's press release on the study may be found
>at <http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/news/press/01/pr0118.htm>.  The IPI has a
>page devoted to the study (including a link to the report itself) at
><http://www.internetpolicy.org/research/results.html>.
>
>The NSF highlights the following findings with respect to the feasibility
>of Internet voting:
>
>- Poll site Internet voting systems offer some benefits and could be
>   responsibly deployed within the next several election cycles;
>
>- The next step beyond poll-site voting would be to deploy kiosk voting
>   terminals in non-traditional public voting sites;
>
>- Remote Internet voting systems pose significant risk and should not be
>   used in public elections until substantial technical and social
>   science issues are addressed; and
>
>- Internet-based voter registration poses significant risk to the integrity
>   of the voting process, and should not be implemented for the foreseeable
>   future.
>
>Terry Carroll, Santa Clara, CA <carroll@tjc.com>
>
>   [These results are rather similar to the findings of the California
>   commission.  Interested readers should also dig up the recent Caltech/MIT
>   report, which states that lever machines, hand-counted paper ballots, and
>   optically scanned ballots are all significantly more accurate than
>   direct-recording voting machines (DREs) and Internet voting schemes.  PGN]



For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC