[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: IP: RE: SEE THE LIGHT BOUNCE: Edupage, March 26, 2001
John, The real question on the table is : is packet switching at all rational in the all optical networks of the future. My estimate is the answer is no. A long time ago Len Kleinrock and myself independently wrote articles strongly suggesting that the nature of very high speed networks was not friendly to TCP/IP and the nature of optics is not, in my opinion , friendly to conventional packet switching. Dave At 05:59 PM 3/26/2001 -0800, you wrote: >From: John Shoch <shoch@alloyventures.com> >To: "'farber@cis.upenn.edu'" <farber@cis.upenn.edu> > >Well, let's not get completely buried by the hype... > >--I hope everyone understands that the "current generation of switches" >described here is (I presume) the electro-mechanical switches used to >reconfigure optical links. The "all optical" MEMS and bubble systems have >switching times which make them useful for configuring and reconfiguring >optical links, but they do not switch at rates which allow them to become >real-time packet switches. Thus, they will not displace real packet routers >from Cisco, Juniper, et al. >--In-line signal conversion may add expense, but it does not (by itself) add >congestion. Optical signals can be amplified, but over time, and distance, >the signal degrades. Optical signals passing through optical switches will, >in many cases, eventually have to be re-generated -- which will still be >done by going through an O-E-O (optical-electronic-optical) conversion. > >John Shoch >Alloy Ventures For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC