interesting-people message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]


Subject: IP: "a secret, open and transparent, telephone board meeting." : Good Morning Silicon Valley Mon Apr 02 12:00:29 EDT 2001



>ICANN approves VeriSign deal in secret, open and transparent, board 
>meeting: After implementing a number of 
><http://www.icann.org/nsi/proposed-com-agreement-tech-corrections-31mar01.htm>11th 
>hour changes to a proposed deal that would give domain registrar behemoth 
>VeriSign 
><http://www.siliconvalley.com/docs/opinion/gmsv/archive01/morn03152001.htm>near 
>monopoly control over the valuable .com registry, the Internet Corporation 
>for Assigned Names and Numbers 
><http://www.icann.org/minutes/prelim-report-02apr01.htm>approved that deal 
>in what ICANN Watch describes as 
><http://www.icannwatch.com/article.php?sid=79&mode=thread&order=0>"a 
>secret, open and transparent, telephone board meeting." [ see url at end 
>of this message djf] This in spite of <http://forum.icann.org/nsi2001/>the 
>vast public outcry against it. On Friday some members of Congress 
><http://www.siliconvalley.com/docs/news/tech/080674.htm>asked the Commerce 
>Department to review the "deal." In a letter to Commerce Secretary Donald 
>Evans, the heads of the House Commerce Committee and the Commerce 
>Committee's Telecommunications and Internet Subcommittee urged the 
>Commerce Department to invoke its power to review the controversial 
>arrangement. "Without taking a position on the propriety of the revised 
>agreement, we want to ensure that any actions by ICANN support and 
>encourage strong, vibrant competition," 
><http://www.icannwatch.com/article.php?sid=72&mode=thread&order=0>the 
>lawmakers wrote. "Accordingly, we respectfully request that the Department 
>fully analyze the competitive issues that arise as a result of this 
>agreement. Further, as Mr. Cerf, Chairman of ICANN, said during our 
>February hearing, ICANN is a consensus development body which requires 
>that major decisions affecting the future of the Internet be done in an 
>open and transparent manner. Therefore, we urge you to exercise your 
>oversight authority to ensure that ICANN's final decision in this matter 
>is made and implemented in a transparent fashion."

http://www.icann.org/minutes/prelim-report-02apr01.htm



For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC