[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: IP: RE: A personal view from your IP Editor -- A missed Broadband Opp ortunity
>Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 18:16:39 -0400 >To: farber@cis.upenn.edu >From: Steve Crocker <steve@stevecrocker.com> > >Dave, et al, > >I just finished shutting down my tiny DSL-based ISP. I had feeds from >Verizon and Covad. Both companies had their strengths and weaknesses, all >of which have been well documented. > >One of the reasons I shut down was lack of control of the service. I >lived in constant fear that a wholesale disruption would leave me with >many unhappy customers and no means of doing anything about it. > >At home, I have two distinct DSL services, one based on Verizon and one >based on Covad. Yes, that's obviously more expensive than a single DSL >line, but it's a whole lot less expensive than even one T1 line, and the >service is roughly in the same league. (Purists will argue; so be it.) I >*vastly* prefer having two DSL lines to having one DSL line and some other >form of back up such as ISDN or dial up. ISDN continues to be a >nightmare, and dialup is too slow. And configuration issues favor having >two DSL lines as well. A standard PC running Windows can be configured to >know about two routers. If one line goes down, little or nothing is >needed to get all the machines to switch to the other line. > >A dual-DSL configuration is not likely to catch on for home use, but for >business use I think it's an excellent balance between cost and reliability. > >There are, of course, some shared points of failure. The copper loops >will likely run through the same trenches and on the same poles, and >they'll terminate in the same central office. Even so, there can >be happy surprises. An idiot operating some construction equipment a >block from my house took out a bunch of overhead telephone lines a year or >so ago. The entire neighborhood was affected. To my surprise, only two >of my POTS lines and my Covad line went down. My third POTS line, which >also happened to have my Verizon DSL service on, was apparently routed >differently and I was still operational. > >Another possible form of back up is Ricochet... > >Cheers! > >Steve > > > > >At 05:52 PM 4/3/2001 -0400, David Farber wrote: > >>>From: Anthony Dye <ADye@evokesoft.com> >>>To: farber@cis.upenn.edu >>>Subject: RE: A personal view from your IP Editor -- A missed Broadband Opp >>> ortunity >>>Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 14:43:01 -0700 >>>X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) >>> >>>You can send this out if you like... >>> >>>My company (Evoke Software) was completely abandoned by Northpoint AND our >>>provider, Verio. Verio made only the barest of efforts to contact us about >>>the impending demise of Northpoint; the email address they had was bad (typo >>>on their part) and they made no effort to phone anyone from the company, >>>even though they have numerous contact numbers for us. If we hadn't paid a >>>bill, I'm sure they would have been in rapid contact with us... but customer >>>service is not their strong point. Verio no longer provides new DSL >>>accounts, even for their Northpoint users. Our San Francisco office uses >>>Verio and Covad, but Verio wouldn't give us a Covad line. They offered us >>>free dialup for 60 days... of course, we only have 4 analog lines for >>>dialout, and we'd have to open up our firewall in SF to let the connections >>>in. >>>They also offered to upgrade us to T-1 access (30 days to install), or else >>>we could call Earthlink and maybe get DSL from them... >>> >>>So, Monday morning, our entire Austin office was suddenly without access to >>>the net. Time Warner Cable says it'll take 90 days to get us cable modem >>>access, SWBell can get us a new DSL line by Thursday of next week. >>> >>>Both options stink... we're sharing modems, 10 people to a connection, until >>>SWBell can get out here. >>> >>>Lesson? No business should go with DSL if they can possibly avoid it. The >>>lack of a SLA means that outages can last for hours, or days, or forever, >>>and companies have no recourse, legal or otherwise. SWBell won't even >>>prorate your bill for the downtime. They make no guarantees of uninterrupted >>>service, either. Get a fractional T-1 if you can, and if not, make sure all >>>your public servers are co-located somewhere else. >>> >>>And make sure you've got a different connection set up for emergencies. When >>>you consider what it's costing us to be without net access, the cost of >>>maintaining a 128K ISDN line is pretty insignificant. >>> >>>-Tony Dye >>> Technical Services >>> Evoke Software >> >> >> >>For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/ > >---------------------------------- >Steve Crocker Associates, LLC Bus: +1 301 654 4707 >5110 Edgemoor Lane Fax: +1 202 478 0458 >Bethesda, MD 20814 steve@stevecrocker.com > For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC