[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: IP: More on park police surveillance in Philly, by Bernie S
>Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 12:47:25 -0400 >To: politech@politechbot.com >From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com> > >X-News-Site: Cluebot is at http://www.cluebot.com/ > >--- >Photos of Independence Hall: >http://www.mccullagh.org/cgi-bin/photosearch.cgi?name=independence+hall >Philadelphia police at 2000 GOP convention: >http://www.mccullagh.org/theme/gop-convention-protests.html >--- > >Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 12:28:22 -0400 >To: declan@well.com >From: e cummings <bernies@netaxs.com> >Subject: more perverse national park police surveillance > >declan, > >a couple of years ago i noticed a new, high-power, remote controlled (pan, >tilt, zoom) video surveillance camera hanging in the bell tower of >independence hall here in philadelphia. it was a large Burle unit--like >those i remember seeing in the maximum-security federal prison i was held >in without bail in 1995 (for an offense the government later admitted in >writing involved "no victims.") this particular high-power video camera >has a huge lens and the ability to zoom in on the smallest details--like >newspaper text--far outside the confines of the small independence >national park area it points out towards. > >the perversity of such a camera being installed in the bell tower of >independence hall--a historical building in which our founding fathers >signed our constitution and risked their lives to revolt against a >government that failed to respect its subjects' privacy--was hard to >ignore. from where liberty had once rung, now our federal government was >using sophisticated electronic surveillance technology to spy on its citizens. > >i brought this ironic situation to the attention of a local newspaper >writer, gwen shaffer, who wrote a cover story about >it: http://www.citypaper.net/articles/122498/coverstory.shtml later that >week, some federal park police officers i spoke with were upset about the >public revelation of their new surveillance system, and claimed it would >impede the system's effectiveness at preventing crime (rape was the >example they gave.) when i asked them how effective a deterrent it could >be if the system remained a secret, they became indignant. > >shortly thereafter, black netting was placed over the bell tower opening, >making the camera very difficult to see. then an identical camera was >added looking south. > >-ed cummings >"CALEA's First Casualty" > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list >You may redistribute this message freely if it remains intact. >To subscribe, visit http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html >This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ >------------------------------------------------------------------------- > For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC