[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: IP: Bluetooth risks airline safety?
>From: Bob Frankston [mailto:rmf2gRisks@bobf.Frankston.com] >Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 22:51 >To: Tom Worthington >Cc: Risks Submissions; Dan Schwinn >Subject: RE: Bluetooth risks airline safety? > > >[Warning: Usual pro-risk, anti-airline rant. Hopefully I won't wear out my >welcome but this one is an egregious example of confusing superstition with >science. I've cc'ed Dan Schwinn since he has expertise here so it would be >worth getting his response before posting.] > >I felt obliged to look at the Advisory Circular. It is a strange document >that should make one very concerned about flying: > >* Rather than presenting evidence it has phrases like "it might be fair to >assume". > >* It says "there is no design standard to ensure that a PED (Personal >Electronic Device) does not interfere with the operation of an aircraft." >But makes no mention of the concept of any responsibility for keeping the >planes flying. The total burden is on the passengers. In fact it says that >it might not be possible to improve avionics because of weight >considerations. Presumably the weight of devices I carry isn't an issue. And >it wouldn't matter anywhere since such devices are simply presumed to be >unsafe. Why are we using such vulnerable avionics anyway? > >* It presents an arbitrary list of electronic devices that are and are not >allowed: >== Portable Voice Recorders? What are these? Large tape recorders? If I have >digital recorder, is that allowed? >== Remote control devices? Does this include infrared? >== Video Recorders? Does this include my digital camera that can do motion >JPeg? Or my voice recorder enhanced with capture? >== What about the myriad of other devices such as watches (which can be >quite complex), cameras (film, digital etc), noise-canceling headsets? > >* The whole notion of solving this by telling people to shut off devices is >irresponsible. It's one thing to make a list of complex rules for commercial >environments and then blaming people if they are confused by the bad user >interface. But you can't get away with telling civilians that they must >watch every rule (especially even if the rules don't make sense). I no more >think about whether my cell phone exists than I remember where I put my keys >after I finish using them. And, increasingly, the radios will simply be >embedded. In fact, I now have a PDA/Phone. While I do shut off the phone >portion, it's also easy for it to accidentally turn it on In the future, >such devices will just decide they need to communicate without even >bothering with the idea that it has a radio inside. > >* Question. In an age where I can take a small cell phone out of my pocket >and communicate both voice and data just about anywhere, why are avionics so >very very fragile? > >Instead of assuring me that the airlines are very concerned about my safety, >this goes along with the book, Fatal Words, in reminding me that these rules >are perverse and arbitrary. The larger danger is in creating brittle systems >rather than resilient one. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Tom Worthington [mailto:tom.worthington@tomw.net.au] >Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 17:25 >Subject: Bluetooth risks airline safety? > > >Digest: Bluetooth risks airline safety? > >An advertisement by Toshiba in the Australian Financial Review Monday 7 May >2001 (page 10: "Portege 3490 with Bluetooth - always ready to network") >suggests that Toshiba laptops can be routinely carried on aircraft switched >on, with Bluetooth devices transmitting: > > > "Imagine two strangers, each carrying Bluetooth-enabled Portege 3490s ... > > In a fraction of a second the Bluetooth module within each detects the > > presence of the other. ... And complete strangers can start playing chess > > together on long flights" > >Apart from being misleading as laptop computers are not designed to be left >on while being carried, this appears at odds with routine airline practice >requiring electronic devices to be switched off during take-off. The use of >radio transmitters by passengers is usually prohibited at any time on an >airline. This is discussed in the Draft Advisory Circular AC 91.22 (0), >FEBRUARY 2000, "PORTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES" from the Australian Civil >Aviation Safety Authority: > http://www.casa.gov.au/prod/avreg/newrules/download/ac/091%5F22.pdf > >In practice, Bluetooth's very low-power spread-spectrum transmitter would be >unlikely to cause interference to an aircraft's systems. However, it would >be unwise to encourage Bluetooth's use on airlines until this is accepted by >airline safety authorities. > >PS: It is possible to use a transmitter in some aircraft. Particularly when >it is a hot air balloon over Parliment and you have a Senator assisting >you: http://www.tomw.net.au/nt/balloon.html > >PPS: More on wireless: http://www.tomw.net.au/2001/wwgw.html > >Tom Worthington FACS; Director, Tomw Communications Pty Ltd ABN: 17 088 714 >309 >http://www.tomw.net.au; Vis.Prof AustralianNatlUniversity; Austrl. Computer >Soc For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC