[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: IP: Network Solutions Blocking Transfers
>Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 09:47:40 -0400 >To: David Farber <farber@cis.upenn.edu> >From: "K.Ellis" <guavaberry@earthlink.net> >Subject: Network Solutions Blocking Transfers > >Network Solutions Blocking Transfers > > >This is a post from one of my lists, dated Thursday 6/28... if anyone is >doing work with domain transfers, this sounds significant: >_____________________________________ > >Network Solutions Blocking Transfers > > >From: David Work > >I may have missed this discussion, but I thought everyone might like to know >what Network Solutions is doing to discourage domain transfers. > >In the good ol' days, you could request a transfer from NSI to another >registrar. The new registrar would make the request, the admin contact would >approve the request, and the "losing registrar" couldn't block the request >unless the domain owner owed money or the registration had expired. > >According to NSI, they used to send confirmations to the admin contact too >(a needless redundancy, but harmless). If the confirmation was NOT responded >to, NSI considered the transfer request to be accepted, and would make the >transfer. > >About 20 days ago, NSI changed the process. If the confirmation was not >responded to, NSI considered the transfer request NOT accepted, and would >let the transfer time out. That is, NSI blocked the transfer if *their* >confirmation was not responded to, regardless of the fact that the customer >is the one who requested the transfer in the first place and had already >confirmed the transfer with the "winning registrar". > >In my case, I have never (ever) received an administrative contact Tracking >Number for domain transfers, so ... as of 20 days ago ... my domain >transfers started timing out. Without notice. Until today, not a single >support rep could tell me what was going on. > >Its actually worse than that. According to the rep, NSI's transfer system >has been broken for weeks and transfers away from NSI aren't working very >well, if at all! > >I believe that NSI hid this problem from its employees in an effort to put >the screws to domain transfers. After all, if the domain expires, then you >*have* to renew the domain registration with them. If you get confused, >impatient or irritated, you'll probably just keep your domain registered >with Network Solutions because its an incredible headache to deal with them >and their ludicrous and complicated procedures. > >If this breakdown was a result of a problem with a new release/upgrade of >their software, as the customer service rep suggested, NSI should have done >what any competent provider would have done - roll back to the most recent >version that still worked. I have to believe that they *are* competent, so >the only conclusion is that the "problems" they've been having for the last >three weeks have been deliberate. > >Here's the good news. According to the person I spoke with today, NSI will >not charge for domains that can't be transferred and have to be renewed >through them because their system is broken. All you have to do is call them >(get put on hold for an hour, but we all have headsets and other things to >do, right?) and request a credit. Time and effort will tell. > >My registrar is Tucows. This is what they have to say about this recent >change: http://www.dnso.org/clubpublic/registrars/Arc01/msg00706.html > >----end--- > > >I can attest to this, having experienced this very problem in June. I >began a domain transfer process, and NSI let the request time out despite >the hours I spent on the phone (on hold) and emails to their customer >support staff. By the time the request timed out and we started the >procedure all over again, the domain expiration date was looming, and in an >attempt to protect my client's interest, I went ahead and paid the fee to >NSI. I received a confirmation email from NSI that the transfer has been >approved, but I'm not convinced that the problem has been solved. > >Has anyone on this list experienced the same problem? How can we, as >(former) customers get restitution for this? I never got to speak to a >human being at NSI about the issue. > >Andrea Meyers <arm0110@yahoo.com> > > ><>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<> >Karen Ellis >The Educational CyberPlayGround >http://www.cyberpg.com/ > >Diversity University Collaboratory Mailing List ISSN:1529-7861 >http://www.cyberpg.com/diversity.html >Cul De Sac Online Curriculum Mailing List ISSN: 1531-7196 >http://www.cyberpg.com/culdesac/Home_culdesac.html >Hot Site Awards New York Times, USA Today , MSNBC, Earthlink >USA Today Best Bets For Educators, Macworld Top Fifty >Philadelphia Inquirer http://education.philly.com/ ><>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<>~~~~~<> For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC