[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: IP: Taxing satellites
>X-Lotus-FromDomain: COMPUTAX >From: Richard_Jarvis@cch.com >To: farber@cis.upenn.edu >Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 08:30:29 -0500 >Subject: Taxing satellites > >Since I specialize in state and local taxation, I would like to point out that >the taxing of satellite property is not really a new idea. Just at the local >level for property tax purposes it might be a little novel. For state >income tax >purposes, it is common to calculate the value of satellites and how often they >are used to either uplink or downlink to a particular state as a way of >determining how much of the income from the bird should be taxed in the >state in >question. It is pretty complicated and quite a mess to sort out. > >For property tax purposes, it is true that aircraft and other mobile property >are taxed. Airlines often pay property taxes in counties that have major >airports based on some sort of proportional use calculation. States try to >determine the number of miles flown over the state in making their >calculations >for income tax and sometimes even sales tax purposes. I'm sure Hughes is quite >concerned given the value of the satellites in question and I'm sure that some >smart assessor in LA has found a way to possibly solve many of the county's >budget problems if this flies (no pun intended). > >Richard Jarvis >Managing Editor >CCH INCORPORATED For archives see: http://www.interesting-people.org/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC