IP: more on Dan Gillmor: Bleak future looms if you don't take a stand

[Dave Farber <dave@farber.net>]

------ Forwarded Message
From: Nathan Cochrane <ncochrane@theage.fairfax.com.au>
Organization: The Age newspaper
Reply-To: ncochrane@theage.fairfax.com.au
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 12:47:37 +1100
To: farber@cis.upenn.edu
Cc: DGillmor@sjmercury.com
Subject: Re: IP: Dan Gillmor: Bleak future looms if you don't  take a stand

Hi Dan

Much of what you wrote is pertinent to Australians.

The incumbent Australian telco, Telstra, has plans to buy a media
company as federal restrictions on media ownership plan to be lifted.
The federal government sees no problems with that, because it wants to
sell the remaining 50.1 per cent of Telstra it owns, and a purchase of
this magnitude would greatly lift the value of its shareholding.

Alston defends Telstra media quest
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/03/24/1016843091374.html

Broadcasters fear monolithic Telstra
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/03/24/1016843089153.html

Expect a rumble in media jungle
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,3995777%255E16
943,00.html

At the same time, the antitrust rottweiler, the Australian Competition
and Consumer Commission, has slapped Telstra for deliberately delaying
the nation's broadband rollout.

ACCC Runs Out of Patience with Telstra's Wholesale Broadband Delays
http://203.6.251.7/accc.internet/digest/view_media.cfm?RecordID=625

Telstra's response
http://www.telstra.com.au/newsroom/release.cfm?ReleaseID=19161

There are even proposals to put the federal government's Australian
Broadcasting Authority, the body that oversees broadcasting legislation
and Internet censorship, in charge of Australia's newsrooms. The ABA's
policing of the Net -- depending on who you talk to -- is
well-intentioned yet porous, comical and irrelevant, or outright dangerous.

Alston acts to ease media binds
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:PpH5xuyKA20C:www.thewest.com.au/2002011
0/news/latest/tw-news-latest-home-sto39487.html+%22australian+broadcasting+a
uthority%22+and+newsrooms&hl=en

Editorial: Government media plan is half-baked
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,4002441%255E75
83,00.html

The aim of the game is partnerships. All these companies are jockeying
for position, stitching up deals with each other even as we sheep dream.
It's not just a US issue, it affects all citizens in developed economies.

"Do not go gentle into that good night. Rage, rage against the dying of
the light!"
- Dylan Thomas

It may not be long before we even that is taken from us.

Nathan


David Farber wrote:

> 
>>
>> From: "Gillmor, Dan" <DGillmor@sjmercury.com>
>> To: "'Dave Farber '" <dave@farber.net>
>> Subject: My line in the sand
>> Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 14:52:54 -0800
>>
>> 
<http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/2922052.htm>http://www.siliconva
lley.com/mld/siliconvalley/2922052.htm
>>
> 
> 
> Dan Gillmor: Bleak future looms if you don't take a stand
> By Dan Gillmor
> Mercury News Technology Columnist
> This is a quiz about your future. It's about how you view some basic
> elements of the emerging Digital Age.
> 1. Do you care if a few giant companies control virtually all
> entertainment and information?
> 2. Do you care if they decide what kinds of technological innovations
> will reach the marketplace?
> 3. Would you be concerned if they used their power to compile detailed
> dossiers on everything you read, listen to, view and buy?
> 4. Would you find it acceptable if they could decide whether what you
> write and say could be seen and heard by others?
> Those are no longer theoretical questions. They are the direction in
> which America is hurtling.
> Media conglomerates are in a merger frenzy. Telecommunications
> monopolies are creating a cozy cartel, dividing up access to the online
> world. The entertainment industry is pushing for Draconian controls on
> the use and dissemination of digital information.
> If you're not infuriated by these related trends, you should at least be
> worried. If you're neither, stop reading this column. You're a sheep,
> content to be herded wherever these giants wish.
> But if you want to retain some fundamental rights over the information
> you use and create, please take a stand. Do it soon, because a great
> deal is at stake.
> The offenses against the public interest have been piling up, one after
> the other, but we've been acting like the proverbial frog that just sits
> there in a pot of water slowly brought to a boil. The frog gets cooked
> because it doesn't realize what's happening until too late.
> The most recent outrage, detailed elsewhere on this page by my
> colleague, Mercury News Staff Writer Dawn Chmielewski, is the music
> companies' scheme to control Internet radio or murder it if they can't.
> Net radio provides the variety and value that broadcast radio, so
> dominated today by a few behemoths, has almost utterly lost. Now it's
> going to disappear, if the greedy souls who dominate commercial music
> have their way -- just one more whack at the public interest to preserve
> the untenable business models of well-connected corporations.
> What can we do about all this?
> I'd been hoping that Congress would come to its senses one of these
> days, and mitigate the damage it has done with laws like the Digital
> Millennium Copyright Act. As prescient critics warned, the law has been
> abused by the entertainment crowd and its craven allies in the
> technology business to threaten scholars, curb free speech and even
> incite outrageous prosecutions.
> I'd been hoping that lawmakers would see the danger of market
> concentration in telecommunications and media. No luck there, either.
> I'd been hoping that the courts might intervene. But courts are more
> political than we learn in our third-grade civics classes. Federal
> judges are nominated and confirmed by politicians who only occasionally
> peek out of the pockets of the special interests. Again and again, with
> few exceptions, judges are upholding laws that trample on tradition and
> rights.
> There's no simple, all-encompassing solution to this dismal situation.
> Fighting for the public interest will involve work on a variety of fronts.
> It's essential, for example, that we put pressure on Congress and keep
> it there. Tell your U.S. House representative and U.S. senators that you
> want real competition, not cozy oligopolies or worse, when it comes to
> telecommunications and media -- and that further industry concentration
> is unacceptable.
> Tell them you don't want to wake up in five years and discover no more
> than two or three ways onto the Net -- at least the truly high-speed
> connections we'll find essential once they're actually available -- in
> your community. Tell them you don't think it's right that one company
> should be able to own all or most of the major media outlets in your
> community.
> And insist that they reject anything resembling legislation introduced
> last week by Sen. Ernest Hollings, D-S.C. This favor to the
> entertainment moguls would lead us down a control-freak path of putting
> copy protection in every digital device.
> Tell them you don't want your PC to be neutered into an expensive DVD
> player. And tell them you don't want the Internet, the greatest enabler
> of free speech in history, to be reduced to online television.
> You can find your member's office in your local phone book, or on the
> Web (www.house.gov/house/MemberWWW.html), or by calling the main number
> at the Capitol ( (202) 224-3121).
> Maybe Congress will listen, though the record so far is bleak. It's
> still worth your effort to try. I'd also like to hear your ideas on what
> we can do, individually and collectively.
> There is a place where we can all make a difference, right now. Let's
> send a message to a key member of the entertainment cartel -- the music
> industry -- and send it in a language the industry can grasp.
> So, here's my line in the sand.
> I've bought my last CD from any major label or independent label that
> puts copy protection on any of its music.
> I have a fine collection of older music, some on CDs and most on
> now-ancient vinyl LPs, which I'm moving gradually to digital formats so
> I can play them back on various devices including a CD player that can
> understand MP3s.
> I'm looking for online music from new artists who aren't afraid of this
> medium, people who will give me value for my money.
> Here's my message to the record industry and its allies:
> I'm not a thief. I'm a customer. When you treat me like a thief, I won't
> be your customer.
> Enough is enough.
> 
> Dan Gillmor's column appears each Sunday, Wednesday and Saturday. E-mail
> dgillmor@sjmercury.com; phone (408) 920-5016; fax (408) 920-5917
> 
> For archives see:
> http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
> 
> .
> 




****************************************************************************
*****
This email and any files transmitted with it may be legally privileged
and confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient of this email,
you must not disclose or use the information contained in it.  If you
have received this email in error, please notify us by return email and
permanently delete the document.
****************************************************************************
*****


------ End of Forwarded Message

For archives see:
http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/