[IP] is it valid -- SBC threatening to enforce 'frame' patent

[Dave Farber <dave@farber.net>]

------ Forwarded Message
From: Bill Daul <bdaul@pacbell.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 00:40:18 -0800
To: dave@farber.net
Subject: Re: [IP] SBC threatening to enforce 'frame' patent

LOOK at all the typos in this.  I don't believe it is valid.

--bill

At 04:54 PM 1/20/2003 +0900, you wrote:

>------ Forwarded Message
>From: Jeff Wasilko <jeffw@smoe.org>
>Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 21:35:00 -0500
>To: Dave Farber <dave@farber.net>
>Subject: SBC threatening to enforce 'frame' patent
>
>Dave:
>
>Thought you might like to see this:
>
>http://www.museumtour.com/sbclawsuit.html
>
>****
>
>SBC Communications claims they own Patent on Internal links and
>Includes, threatens to sue the little guys first, then move to
>the big guys.
>
>We received a 40 page package from SBC Intellectual Property
>today informing us that our web site  which has links on the left
>side that go to other web pages within the site  but does not
>lose the left side navigation links  was in violation of their
>Structured Document Browser Patent.
>
>
>****
>
>-j
>
>
>------ End of Forwarded Message
>
>-------------------------------------
>You are subscribed as bdaul@pacbell.net
>To unsubscribe or update your address, click
>   http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
>
>Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


--
Bill Daul

bdaul@pacbell.net
Business Relationship Strategist
http://www.human-landscaping.com

"Play With Boundaries, Not Within."


------ End of Forwarded Message

-------------------------------------
To unsubscribe or update your address, click
  http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/