[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: Re: [IP] Online predictive markets (IEEE Spectrum)
may be some reading of past misdeeds will help . DaveAlso with todays long term research being two years, one finds research being "commercialized" before its shortcomings are understood.
Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 08:53:20 -0400 From: Steven Cherry <s.cherry@ieee.org> Subject: Re: [IP] Online predictive markets (IEEE Spectrum) At 10:46 PM -0700 8/8/03, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:As others have pointed out, the PAM presumes that everybody has the same goals--essentially, to make money. If something like PAM were taken seriously by the police, a well funded terrorist group with a bunch of sympathizers could and would spend money to distort the market. It wouldn't work every time, but it could sure work when there was something big planned. Of course if you know they are terrorist sympathizers you discount their contributions--but then terrorist sympathizers look an awful like the sort of people who might actually know something and want to make a little cash on the side.Of course, commercial and gambling markets are subject to similar manipulation.My understanding is that if a market is set up correctly, it's sometimes (perhaps not always) possible to discern and filter out such manipulation. Once the market was set up, it would be possible to simulate such activity and test that. Let's remember that Darpa is a *research* agency and such experiments are its reason for being.Steven
------------------------------------- To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC