[IP] More on pornography as a consequence of p2p?

[Dave Farber <dave@farber.net>]

Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 17:51:37 -0400
From: Andrew Russell <arussell@jhu.edu>
Subject: Re: [IP] More on pornography as a consequence of p2p?
X-Sender: arusse14@pop.jhu.edu
To: dave@farber.net
X-Spam-Status: No,
 hits=-0.2 required=7.5 
tests=IN_REP_TO,SUBJ_ENDS_IN_Q_MARK,PORN_10,DOUBLE_CAPSWORD,
 MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_2 version=2.31
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Filtered-At: eList eXpress <http://www.elistx.com/>

> > Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 16:21:02 -0400
> > From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>
> > Subject: More on pornography as a consequence of p2p?
> > To: dave@farber.net
> >
> >
> > The purported linkage of pornography to networks is getting worse.
> > Per 
> > http://www.iowastatedaily.com/vnews/display.v/ART/2003/09/08/3f5be89a63245
> > there's a Senate hearing on Tuesday on "Pornography, Technology and Process:
> > Problems and Solutions on Peer-to-Peer Networks."  One of the people
> > testifying, Prof. Doug Jacobson of Iowa State, is quoted in the article
> > as saying "[Peer-to-peer] is like anything -- it's a tool.  There are
> > few legitimate uses of peer-to-peer networks." [ DUMB DUMB djf]

Dave I hope you or someone senior who understands this issue can tell the 
good Senators the truth about the meaning of p2p networks!!!!!!

[Love to do so. djf] 

-------------------------------------
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/