[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: [IP] more on Code Monkeys, not.
-----Original Message----- From: Bob Frankston <Bob2-19@bobf.frankston.com> Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 20:02:46 To:dave@farber.net, "'Ip'" <ip@v2.listbox.com> Subject: RE: [IP] : Code Monkeys, not. Programming itself is not that special. Coding itself is not the issue. Not only is it easy to outsource the mechanical aspects, we create often tools such as compilers and "outsource" to the computers. The limitation on outsourcing is product development which involves disparate groups of people working together and informal "water-cooler" channels. One source of dot-bombs was a failure to understand this domestically -- outsourcing key technologies (domestically) rather than bringing them "into the loop". There are real issues of cultural context and knowledge but they are not intrinsic. A professor from the City University of Hong Kong told me about their exchange program with mainland China and how the students are getting a "Western" style perspective as well as the mainland perspective -- flexible thinking complementing well-honed skills. I try to avoid words like "foreign" -- the US isn't that special. If anything its triumph is due to its disorder and thus openness to bad ideas that turn out to be great ideas. As Christian points out, the US has only a small portion of the highly skilled people in the world. The biggest threat to the US is a shift from hierarchical systems to flexible organizations. The Internet is an added factor as it continues to become more of an informal social medium. A combination of IM and click to talk/see including topics like soccer and cricket can create the kind of relationships that drive the process. Talking about baseball won't cut it -- all you can talk to are other Americans and maybe some Japanese. (Disclaimer -- I talk about talking about sports but not the sports themselves) Remember that there is also great fear of the reverse -- losing technologies to the US. Isolationism is increasingly out of synch with an interconnected world. -----Original Message----- From: owner-ip@v2.listbox.com [mailto:owner-ip@v2.listbox.com] On Behalf Of Dave Farber Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 11:39 To: Ip Subject: [IP] : Code Monkeys, not. I agree with this note djf -----Original Message----- From: Christian Huitema <huitema@windows.microsoft.com> Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 08:10:11 To:dave@farber.net, ip@v2.listbox.com Subject: Code Monkeys, not. Am I the only one to be chocked by the xenophobic undertones of the "outsourcing" debate? Do people here seriously believe that computer science graduates from India or China are somehow doomed to be less smart than those of American universities? Anyone who has worked with graduates from the IIT or the University of Beijing knows that this is obviously not the case! China and India are graduating more engineers than the US. The H1B debate showed that convincing all of them to move to the US is not a serious option. These folks, our colleagues, will get jobs and develop industries in their own countries. The outsourcing debate will not go anywhere if we don't first show respect for all parties involved. -- Christian Huitema ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as BobIP@Bobf.Frankston.com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/ ------------------------------------- To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC