interesting-people message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]


Subject: [IP] more on Kodak wins Java lawsuit




Begin forwarded message:

From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
Date: October 3, 2004 5:59:40 PM EDT
To: dave@farber.net, Ip <ip@v2.listbox.com>
Subject: Re: [IP] Kodak wins Java lawsuit

Dave:

If Java infringes upon Kodak's patents (which formerly belonged to Wang),
what about any other object-oriented language with late binding, such
as Object REXX, Objective-C, or even Visual BASIC? What about
object-oriented extensions of any other language with late binding,
including (for example) Perl?

What about distributed object models such as CORBA, DCOM, or SOAP?

And wasn't much of the technology described in the patents implemented
in Smalltalk, which was developed more than 20 years ago?

I'm an advocate of patents -- even software patents -- that cover true
innovations. But if these patents are allowed to stand, they could inhibit
the use of technologies which clearly pre-date them.

See the patents at

http://tinyurl.com/2vfwt

http://tinyurl.com/yvlow

and

http://tinyurl.com/324bp

--Brett Glass


At 01:50 PM 10/3/2004, David Farber wrote:

My only opinion of that court ruling would most likely find me in
contempt. djf

-------------------------------------
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC