[IP] On junk science

[David Farber <dave@farber.net>]

Begin forwarded message:

From:
Date: December 7, 2004 7:05:50 PM EST
To: dave@farber.net


W Junk science is itself a rats nest of conflicts of interest and nutty 
axi-grinding. Its "editor" is tied to the Cato Institute and is a 
regular on low-brow stuff like the Gordon Liddy Show and Fox.  It is 
cranky street-theater, and not worthy of serious people who can 
actually think for themselves.
best
-

On Dec 7, 2004, at 2:28 PM, David Farber wrote:

> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Jim Warren <jwarren@well.com>
> Date: December 7, 2004 5:19:23 PM EST
> To: Dave Farber:;
> Subject: fwd: Junk Science Awards...
>
> http://www.junkscience.com/dec04/junkscienceawards2004.htm
>
> WASHINGTON, D.C., (Dec. 1) -- JunkScience.com today announced its list 
> of the Top Ten Most Embarrassing Moments in Health and Environmental 
> Science for 2004. The list spotlights individuals and organizations 
> that -- through exaggerated claims, bad judgment, and/or hidden 
> agendas -- have most egregiously undermined public confidence in the 
> scientific community's capacity to conduct sound and unbiased 
> research.
>
> -------------------------------------
> You are subscribed as psaffo@iftf.org
> To manage your subscription, go to
>  http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip
>
> Archives at: 
> http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/

-------------------------------------
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/