[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: [IP] On AMD, Apple, Intel, IBM and The Great Game of Chips
_______________ Forward Header _______________ Subject: On AMD, Apple, Intel, IBM and The Great Game of Chips Author: Koranteng Ofosu-Amaah <amaah@comcast.net> Date: 6th June 2005 9:34:30 am http://koranteng.blogspot.com/2005/06/on-amd-apple-intel-ibm-and-great-game.html I posted this 10 days ago in my internal IBM Blogcentral joint but thought it might deserve a wider audience. Robert Russell points to rumours of Apple to move from PowerPC to Intel. Indeed like the question of who would be the new pope a few weeks ago, the entire blogosphere is abuzz with prognostications. Everybody seems to be concentrating on Apple's strategic outlook and admittedly they are the sexiest company in technology. Intel would be grateful, Microsoft would be curious, IBM would be unhappy but who cares about those companies, right? The Big Apple is where the action is at, right? The elephant in the room of all these discussions is AMD. Intel has been falling behind under the repeated onslaught of AMD's Hammer architecture, first with the Athlon which beat them in the race to 1 GHz, then the Opteron favoured by white box manufacturers everywhere, the move to 64 bit computing on the desktop (now that Windows XP 64 bit edition is out that paradigm is legitimized even though Linux and BSD were there earlier) where Athlon 64 rules and now in the dual core race in which they again don't have a competitive or affordable offering. In all of these things, Intel has played second fiddle to the fleeter AMD. They have made huge architectural mistakes read the Pentium IV which is too big, runs too hot and doesn't perform, rushed and recalled products. If you read ARS Technica, AnandTech or Toms Hardware this would be the story that enthusiasts would tell. It is only a huge amount of payola (read the Intel Inside war chest) that has kept people like Dell exclusively in the Intel camp. Indeed all the first tier manufacturers have AMD in their product lines. Now all affiliate programs are smart marketing and moral payola so don't read my words as pejorative. Obviously also Intel has the edge on process technology and scale which will mitigate the fallout but they are have been shaken by the AMD onslaught. They like Microsoft can turn on the dime and become hardcore, the problem in The Great Game of Chips is that you have those pesky fabs which take 18 months to a 2 years to turn around, thus any mistake you make ties you up for a good 8 to 10 quarters which is an eternity in Wall Street terms. In mitigation for Intel, AMD can't afford any mistakes given their harrowing corporate history and the skepticism that the market's familiarity with Intel entail. However, with their Dresden fab humming along, they've been able to have generate product at will and on time and more importantly to control pricing: the best chips on the market always command premium pricing with AMD had never been able to have. It doesn't hurt also that they aren't trying to compete with their clients, the chipset manufacturers like Intel is so the ecosystem around their offerings is chugging along nicely. The big bang of the web, of the data center came about because in the hardware arena, AMD was pushing Moore's law at a furious pace to the delight of Taiwanese chipset manufacturers everywhere. Google's server farms in the past used mostly Intel but I'd hazard that the reason those servers were so cheap and disposable was the competition with the unsung AMD. The replacement cycle for machines bought during the of the Y2K hype was a little delayed by the bust of 2000-2001 and the current Iraq war uncertainty but in the next 18-24 months the hardware arena is going to be exciting. And AMD has product, Microsoft has even been complaisant with Windows XP 64 on the software front, they too don't want a monopoly on the hardware front. While the dual core dream might be delayed, a nice dual-processor Opteron with 64 bit Linux distribution would serve most small companies very well. If you won't deal with PowerPC, IBM and others will sell you some happily. [snip] http://koranteng.blogspot.com/2005/06/on-amd-apple-intel-ibm-and-great-game.html -- Koranteng -- Koranteng's Toli: the blog edition http://koranteng.blogspot.com/ "Just because a lizard nods its head doesn't mean it's happy." - old Ghanaian proverb ------------------------------------- To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC