[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: [IP] more on 'Splogs' Roil Web, and Some Blame Google
Begin forwarded message: From: Mary Shaw <mary.shaw@gmail.com> Date: October 26, 2005 9:47:15 AM EDT To: dave@farber.net Cc: Roy h Weil <roy@shaw-weil.com> Subject: Re: [IP] 'Splogs' Roil Web, and Some Blame GoogleNot only that, they're also parasitizing wikis. What should we call this? Whamming?
I set up a little Wiki at http://www.science-of-design.org for the Science of Design community in CS to share ideas and (principally) contribute to an annotated bibliography. We decided to try the reasonable person principle first and allow anyone to contribute without registering -- we did not want to place any impediments in the way of shy people, and we have no interest in collecting personal information.
Yesterday I discovered that the Main and Help pages had become carriers of links that are probably to drug ads. Chief offenders appear to be joia[dot]com, warp0[dot]com, and phentermine-online[dot] various-stuff[dot]obscure-country-code. Most of the offending edits simply appended links to the end of the pages in such a way that they don't show up when the page is viewed. I only noticed when one of them replaced the entire main page with these links. I assume their purpose was to increase Google ranking.
We took the minimalist action of restricting editing of the Main and Help pages to sysops, hoping that the vandalism only involves scanning for open wikis and changing the pages that are always there, not chasing links into the site. If necessary, we'll reluctantly go to editing by login only.
On 10/26/05, David Farber <dave@farber.net> wrote: Begin forwarded message: From: Monty Solomon <monty@roscom.com > Date: October 26, 2005 1:24:56 AM EDT To: undisclosed-recipient:; Subject: 'Splogs' Roil Web, and Some Blame Google 'Splogs' Roil Web, and Some Blame Google By DAVID KESMODEL THE WALL STREET JOURNAL ONLINE October 19, 2005; Page B1 Spam, long the scourge of email users, rapidly has become the bane of bloggers too. Spammers have created millions of Web logs to promote everything from gambling Web sites to pornography. The spam blogs -- known as "splogs" -- often contain gibberish, and are full of links to other Web sites spammers are trying to promote. Because search engines like those of Google Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Yahoo Inc. base their rankings of Web sites, in part, on how many other Web sites link to them, the splogs can help artificially inflate a site's popularity. Some of the phony blogs also carry advertisements, which generate a few cents for the splog's owner each time they are clicked on. The phony blogs are a particular problem for Google, Microsoft and Yahoo because each offers not only a Web search engine focused on providing the most relevant results for users but also a service to let bloggers create blogs. Just this past weekend, Google's popular blog-creation tool, Blogger, was targeted in an apparently coordinated effort to create more than 13,000 splogs, the search giant said. The splogs were laced with popular keywords so that they would appear prominently in blog searches, and several bloggers complained online that that the splogs were gumming up searches for legitimate sites. ... http://online.wsj.com/public/article/ SB112968552226872712-8b5l_fijhNltE4s7DX6tvLI9XNo_20061025.html ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as mary.shaw@gmail.com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ipArchives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting- people/
------------------------------------- To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC