interesting-people message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]


Subject: [IP] more on Microsoft responds re Windows XP update vs. spyware




Begin forwarded message:

From: Andy Oram <andyo@oreilly.com>
Date: June 7, 2006 3:22:50 AM EDT
To: dave@farber.net
Subject: Re: [IP] Microsoft responds re Windows XP update vs. spyware

Does anybody have information on the legal relationship between disabling software after its licensing and laws regarding licensing? I remember that a proposed change to licensing laws in the 1990s, called UCITA and then UCC 2B (http://www.badsoftware.com/ uccindex.htm) would have made this sort of thing commonplace. But UCC 2B was largely defeated! So is there a legal basis for disabling software?

Andy


-------------------------------------
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC