[IP] Senate Commerce Committee reprive for broadcast flag, net neutrality decisions

[David Farber <dave@farber.net>]

Begin forwarded message:

From: Bob Frankston <Bob2-19-0501@bobf.frankston.com>
Date: June 22, 2006 4:35:55 PM EDT
To: dave@farber.net, ip@v2.listbox.com
Subject: RE: [IP] Senate Commerce Committee reprive for broadcast  
flag, net neutrality decisions

If the price of NN is the Broadcast Flag I'll take a pass on  
legislating NN
and trust the marketpalce. The Broadcast Flag is a direct attack on the
marketplace by making innovation a federal offense.

http://www.frankston.com

-----Original Message-----
From: David Farber [mailto:dave@farber.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 16:19
To: ip@v2.listbox.com
Subject: [IP] Senate Commerce Committee reprive for broadcast flag, net
neutrality decisions



Begin forwarded message:

From: Ethan Ackerman <eackerma@u.washington.edu>
Date: June 22, 2006 4:12:38 PM EDT
To: dave@farber.net
Subject: Senate Commerce Committee reprive for broadcast flag, net
neutrality decisions

Greetings Dave,

Perhaps begining to realize just how big a bite it has taken on sooo
many contentious issues related to telecom reform, the Senate Commerce
Committee hearing scheduled for today just adjourned.  The Committee
had made it less than one-tenth of the way through its markup of
S.2686, the Senate's version of the telecom. reform bill.

The two concerns most dear to the technology community, 'net
neutrality' and 'broadcast flag' issues, weren't addressed, and it
doesn't look like they will be until next week at the earliest.


-------------------------------------
You are subscribed as BobIP@Bobf.Frankston.com
To manage your subscription, go to
  http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting- 
people/




-------------------------------------
To manage your subscription, go to
 http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip

Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/