[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: [IP] more on NOT ] Illegal tactics in getting to voters
Begin forwarded message: From: Seth Breidbart <sethb@panix.com> Date: November 7, 2006 4:45:57 PM EST To: dave@farber.net Subject: Re: [IP] more on NOT ] Illegal tactics in getting to voters Paul Levy <plevy@citizen.org> wrote:
do the FTC's rules apply to purely political speech? I rather doubt it, and I doubt that they would be constitutional to the extent that they did
Content-independent rules are Constitutional. For instance, amplified sound trucks are illegal (based on decibel level), it doesn't matter whether they're advertising political candidates or ice cream. Likewise, rules about "Don't lie on CLID" and "Caller must release the line when callee hangs up" (passed when someone died because an auto-caller held the line and he couldn't call 911) and "Multiple calls to someone who doesn't want them is harassment" are Constitutional, because they have nothing to do with the content of the calls. Seth ------------------------------------- To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC