[IP] Kevin Martin to ATT - don't worry we will enforce nothing - why C & A should investigate ATT under C.F. R. Sec. 1.17

[David Farber <dave@farber.net>]

Begin forwarded message:

From: Gordon Cook <cook@COOKREPORT.COM>
Date: December 31, 2006 10:00:04 AM EST
To: CYBERTELECOM-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Subject: Kevin Martin to ATT - don't worry we will enforce nothing -  
why C & A should investigate ATT under C.F. R. Sec. 1.17
Reply-To: Telecom Regulation & the Internet <CYBERTELECOM- 
L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM>

How many people here have read the Martin Tate comment on the merger  
approval? http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/ 
DOC-269281A1.pdf

 The ones where they said to ATT don't worry we will not enforce  
your NN concessions!?!?  I think this is a huge part of this story  
going as yet undiscovered.  Copps and Adelstein need to refuse to  
allow a wriTten order to finalize this.

Copps and Adelstein Should Investigate ATT under 47 C.F.R. Sec. 1 . 
17  http://gordoncook.net/wp/?p=115

Thanks to Scott McCollough for suggesting the above strategy.

please see  Bait and Switch: Kevin Martin’s Last Laugh as He Negates  
ATT’s Merger Concessions  http://gordoncook.net/wp/?p=113

also see  Why the ATT Merger is Not Yet a Done Deal  http:// 
gordoncook.net/wp/?p=114

=============================================================
The COOK Report on Internet Protocol, 609 882-2572 (PSTN) 415  
651-4147 (Lingo) Back Issues: http://www.cookreport.com/ 
browse_past_free2.shtml   Cook's Collaborative Edge Blog http:// 
gordoncook.net/wp/   Subscription info: http://cookreport.com/ 
subscriptions.shtml
=============================================================


-------------------------------------------
<HR>
subscription, go to<BR>  <A HREF="http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip";>http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip</A><P>Archives at: <A HREF="http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/intere
ar