[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: [IP] It's just CFR -- Copper Fiber and Radios vs Telecom?
Begin forwarded message: From: Bob Frankston <Bob19-0501@bobf.frankston.com> Date: January 29, 2007 12:14:00 AM EST To: Dave Farber <dave@farber.net> Subject: It's just CFR -- Copper Fiber and Radios vs Telecom?I just posted http://www.frankston.com/?Name=OurCFR to ask why we have to pay a service for the fixed assets in our neighborhoods.
Yes, I’m oversimplifying and am working on longer pieces that drill down on the details but for now we need a strong dose of simple truth rather than wallowing in endless debates about who should own our basic arteries and how much they should charge us to use them.
Back in the old days we’d just run our own wires to connect phones and terminals and later we used coax and radios to do our own networking. The ESS was just another computer that happened to be designed to run a telephony app. We seem to have forgotten all we knew and accept the idea that we have to pay someone for each bit. The more I think about it the stranger it is. Imagine if you tried to charge LAN users for each bit.
Having Verizon tell me I have to use their router to get their TV service and watching them run RG-6 to get IP to my Set Top Boxes brought this all home – literally.
By framing it in terms of CFR I hope to make things very simple and avoid getting lost in side issues. It reminds of me the first ATT divestiture and the warnings that we’d never be able to make a telephone call again.
CFR is simple and removes the mystery. We can then wonder why a small number of incumbent service providers (we shouldn’t call them carriers) own our fixed assets and then charge us to use them for local bits let alone to connect to the rest of the world.
Looking at it this way the whole debate over network neutrality and broadband seems very confused and this confusion service to protect the incumbents from serious scrutiny.
Ownership doesn’t mean we climb up the poles ourselves (unless we want to) – it means we can hire companies to install and maintain and we don't to pay a monthly fee for what we already own. It also means we can share and immediately get complete wireless coverage without treating muni-WiFi as another expensive adventure (http:// www.frankston.com/?name=WiFiEdge).
------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- You are subscribed as galvin@eListX.com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ipArchives at: j6
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC