[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: [IP] the money behind patent trolls?
Begin forwarded message: From: "David P. Reed" <dpreed@reed.com> Date: April 26, 2007 11:06:45 AM EDT To: dave@farber.net Cc: ip@v2.listbox.com Subject: Re: [IP] the money behind patent trolls?Perhaps the lawyers on this list can use this as an opportunity to explain why and when champerty can/should be legal, when in most cases investing in a lawsuit has been viewed as a very bad, very bad thing. It's clear that these guys are engaging in Champerty, the only question is whether it is a legal form of same. http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Champerty
Of course, the right-wing anarcho-libertarians who never saw a property-right they didn't love probably just love the concept of a new form of "securitized lawsuit option" - perhaps we can create a market on one of the commodities exchanges for Lawsuit Futures and Options on Lawsuit Futures.
-------------------------------------------
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC