[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: [IP] NH federal judge over-rules privacy law - 1st Amendment protects reselling medical records.
Begin forwarded message: From: Ethan Ackerman <eackerma@u.washington.edu> Date: May 22, 2007 5:30:43 PM EDT To: David Farber <dave@farber.net>Subject: NH federal judge over-rules privacy law - 1st Amendment protects reselling medical records.
Greetings Dave, The New Hampshire Legislature recently enacted a law that bars pharmacies, insurance companies, and similar entities from transferring or using both patient-identifiable data and prescriber-identifiable data for certain commercial purposes. The law was enacted to protect patient privacy, prescriber privacy, and to prevent drug industry 'targeting' of doctors who prescribed generics. It was promptly challenged by 2 data-mining companies who buy up prescription records from pharmacies and resell the info to drug manufacturers, and on April 30th was overturned by US District Court Judge Paul Barbadoro. Judge Barbadoro ruled that the data-miners had a 1st Amendment right to resell the prescription records and the State of New Hampshire violated that right in passing this law.http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/21/ AR2007052101701.html
has a "big picture" treatment of the issue which mentions the case. It also looks like the state plans to appeal -http://www.citizen.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070504/ NEWS0201/70504029/-1/CITIZEN
-------------------------------------------
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC