[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: [IP] Re: Move over FISA Oversight
-----Original Message----- From: Serge Egelman [mailto:egelman@cs.cmu.edu] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 1:04 PM To: dave@farber.net Subject: Re: [IP] Move over FISA Oversight One question that I haven't seen anyone in the media ask: What does this new law allow them to do that they haven't *already* been doing? Since some in the Bush Administration have said this law is needed to legalize some of their surveillance programs, besides being a tacit admission to breaking the law, this would mean that they've already been doing some (or many) of the things that have just been legalized. serge Dave Farber wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > From: Malin, Bradley A [mailto:b.malin@Vanderbilt.Edu] > Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 12:05 AM > To: dave@farber.net > Subject: Move over FISA Oversight > > Sure, this is main stream news, but this law will have an incredible > amount of influence on the collection and use of U.S. communications > data (calls, emails, etc.). This law affects the intelligence > community's ability to monitor communications with foreigners that are > overseas, but I wonder when "probable cause" will allow them to sniff > information that is in the U.S. For instance, if there is evidence to > suggest that "foreigners" have adopted technology to use U.S. IP > addresses (despite the fact that there are many legitimate reasons for > U.S. citizens using such technology when abroad), will they be able to > intercept and study such communications? > > The new law is set to expire after 6 months, but what about cases in > which "sufficient evidence" (interpret that as you may) has been > gathered? Will they be able to continue monitoring without judicial > oversight? What will happen to the data that is gathered over the next > six months? Can that be analyzed after the six month window? Are we > creating a block of time in which the data lives in the Wild West? > > Just some thoughts to brighten our morning, > > -brad > > > http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/08/07/terrorist.surveillance.ap/index.h > tml > > New law changes U.S. eavesdropping rules > > WASHINGTON (AP) -- For the first time in nearly four decades, a senior > intelligence official -- not a secretive federal court -- will have a > decisive voice in whether Americans' communications can be monitored > when they talk to foreigners overseas. > > The shift came over the weekend as Congress hustled through changes to > the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, known as FISA. > > The bill provides new powers to the National Security Agency to monitor > communications that enter the United States and involve foreigners who > are the subjects of a national security investigation. > > <snip> > > > ------------------------------------------- -- /* Serge Egelman PhD Candidate Vice President for External Affairs, Graduate Student Assembly Carnegie Mellon University Legislative Concerns Chair National Association of Graduate-Professional Students */ -------------------------------------------
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC