[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: [IP] The Online Medical Records Trap
Begin forwarded message: From: Jeffrey Schiller <jis@MIT.EDU> Date: October 4, 2007 11:40:53 PM EDT To: David Farber <dfarber@cs.cmu.edu> Cc: Lauren Weinstein <lauren@vortex.com> Subject: Re: The Online Medical Records Trap For IP if you wish... I find this passage in the HealthVault privacy policy telling:
Microsoft may access and/or disclose your personal information if we believe such action is necessary to: (a) comply with the law or legal process served on Microsoft; (b) protect and defend the rights or property of Microsoft (including the enforcement of our agreements); or (c) act in urgent circumstances to protect the personal safety and welfare of users of Microsoft services or members of the public.
Ok, (a) is the "we were subpoenaed" clause. Though it is interesting in the way it was worded, they don't have to ensure the validity of the subpoena, they just have to believe it is "necessary" to provide the information. (c) Is the National Security hook. But (b) now that is interesting. Does that mean that if I bring an action against Microsoft (say one of their updates damaged my computer [yes I know the EULA probably means I hosed anyway... but for argument sake]) they can peruse my medical records to "defend their rights?" -Jeff -- ======================================================================== Jeffrey I. Schiller MIT Network Manager Information Services and Technology Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue Room W92-190 Cambridge, MA 02139-4307 617.253.0161 - Voice jis@mit.edu ======================================================================== -------------------------------------------
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC