[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: [IP] Re: Gates, Monsanto, others investing $30-mil in "doomsday seed bank"
Begin forwarded message: From: Titus Brown <titus@caltech.edu> Date: December 5, 2007 9:11:51 PM EST To: Dave Farber <dave@farber.net>Subject: Re: [IP] Gates, Monsanto, others investing $30-mil in "doomsday seed bank"
Reply-To: titus@idyll.org On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 05:42:07PM -0500, Dave Farber wrote: -> -----Original Message----- -> From: Jim Warren [mailto:jwarren@well.com] -> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 4:56 PM -> To: Dave Farber-> Subject: Gates, Monsanto, others investing $30-mil in "doomsday seed bank"
->-> How benevolent of them. (Or do they know something we don't know?) --jim
-> -> http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7529 [ ... ] -> Did we miss something here? Their press release stated, 'so that crop-> diversity can be conserved for the future.' What future do the seed bank's -> sponsors foresee, that would threaten the global availability of current -> seeds, almost all of which are already well protected in designated seed
-> banks around the world? I found this article by Seabrook in the New Yorker to be a very interesting discussion of the global seed bank: http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/08/27/070827fa_fact_seabrook At least according to Seabrook, the diversity of seeds in seed banks is fast decreasing and we are close to a "diversity" crisis that could have dramatic consequences on our ability to adapt to future crop disasters. The payoff for Monsanto for keeping this diversity alive is pretty obvious, I would think, given biotech's reliance on modifying existing strains rather than creating new ones entire. --titus -------------------------------------------
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC