Begin forwarded message:
[dave, for ip if you wish. best /r] From the Toronto StarDomain name policy puts us in Internet vanguardby Michael GeistMon 28 Apr 2008Page: B02Section: BusinessEarlier this month, the Canadian Internet Registration Authority,the agency that manages the dot-ca domain, celebrated itsone-millionth domain name registration. While that represents animportant milestone, a far more noteworthy development is that CIRAalso quietly announced the implementation of a new "whois" policythat will better protect the privacy of hundreds of thousands ofCanadians and serve as a model for domain name registries aroundthe world.The whois issue has attracted little public attention, yet it hasbeen the subject of heated debate within the domain name communityfor many years. It revolves around the whois database, a publiclyaccessible, searchable list of domain name registrant information(as in "who is" the registrant of a particular domain name).When CIRA was first established, its whois policy permitted detaileddisclosures about domain name registrants. A typical whois entryincluded the domain name itself, the name of the registrant andcomprehensive contact information including postal address, phoneand fax numbers, as well as email addresses.The ready availability of such information proved useful to lawenforcement, which often used whois information as part ofcybercrime investigations. Similarly, the pursuit of intellectualproperty infringement claims, such as domain name cybersquattingcases, relied upon access to whois information to commence legalchallenges to domain name registrations.Notwithstanding these uses, CIRA recognized that its policy ofpublicly disclosing personal information was generating significantdiscomfort among many registrants. Citing privacy and spamconcerns, many registrants preferred to conceal their identity fromthe public (though CIRA and the domain name registrar responsiblefor the registration would have access to the personalinformation).Moreover, registrants of controversial domain names, such as domainsused for websites devoted to public criticism or politicaladvocacy, often wanted to shield their personal information forfear of public censure.As privacy and data protection commissioners began to expressreservations about the legality of requiring domain nameregistrants to disclosure their personal information, CIRA proposeda new policy in 2004. After two major public consultations,mounting opposition from law enforcement about its loss of"unfettered" access to whois data and years of operational delays,CIRA last week began informing registrants that the new policy willtake effect on June 10, 2008.Under the new policy, CIRA will continue to collect the same contactinformation from registrants as under its current policy. However,it will no longer require that such information be publiclyavailable through its whois directory. In its place, CIRA will onlyrequire the public disclosure of limited technical information,though individual registrants may voluntarily "opt-in" to providingmore personal information.While the CIRA policy protects the privacy of individualregistrants, corporate or organizational registrants will typicallyhave their full information publicly disclosed. The policyrecognizes that corporate information does not raise specificprivacy concerns since corporate information does not constitutepersonally identifiable information. Moreover, consumers may oftenwant to access corporate whois information when judging thereliability of a website.In order to ensure that domain name registrants can still becontacted, CIRA has also established a unique message deliverysystem. CIRA will allow the public to contact domain nameregistrants without access to their personal information byrelaying the message through a Web-based submission form.The Canadian changes may be long overdue, however, they alsoinstantly catapult the dot-ca into a global leadership position.With more than a million Canadian domain name registrations, theresolution of the whois issue ensures that the Canadian domain namespace is set for continued growth as it now features a "privacyadvantage" over other domains struggling to strike a similarcompromise.Michael Geist holds the Canada Research Chair in Internet andE-commerce Law at the University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law. Heserved on the CIRA board from 2000-2006 and was active supporter ofwhois policy reforms. He can reached at mgeist @ uottawa.ca oronline at www.michaelgeist.ca
|