Begin forwarded message:
Sorry, by "stationary" I meant either "geostationary" or "at alagrange point".And indeed, the space junk issue was what got me thinking of it. Atfirst I figured it would likely collect in a common ecliptic band(presumably coplanar with that of our moon). And in fact that mightbe what happens. The problem is the timescale.The fascinating part of all this (for me) is social context. In the(very late) 60s and 70s, when I was little, the cold war was in fullbloom and even earth day et al didn't (as I remember) have a hugeimpact on space exploration. So this question of leaving trash inorbit was just a "huh" question. Nowadays I realise the space junkissue can be yet another example of poisoning the (extra-)globalenvironment in an irreversible way, so I wonder if you could attractactual attention / reduction in the amount of crud through publicity.Unfortunately, I suspect if you're going to fight a war anyway,abrogating a treaty is the least of your worries. The only checks areresources and self-interest.-dPS: Military operations are basically by definition environmentallynasty: make the other guy's local environment so nasty that hecroaks. And since you're really worried about accomplishing that, youexpand the definition of "local" a bit in case he's moved around orhas a few buddies over.But we often forget that military maintenance (practice, surveillance,etc) are also environmentally bad news during peacetime too as themilitary is immune the the various EPA/OSHA laws (I suspect OSHA wouldnot approve of a workplace that included people shooting at you). Iimagine there's a small bit of environmental consideration in militarydecisions just to avoid poisoning your own people. But I doubt anyonewould seriously consider making that a meaningful issue in planningany military operations.On May 12, 2008, at 01:29 , David Farber wrote:
________________________________________
From: David Byrden [farber1@byrden.com]
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 3:43 AM
From: DV Henkel-Wallace [gumby@henkel-wallace.org]
in the exploding-stationary case stuff exploding in directions
other than axially will shift around and take millennia to clear
up.
Er, there's no such thing as a stationary case. If you put something
stationary in space above Earth it will, not surprisingly, fall down.
You have to orbit things, extremely fast, to keep them up there. And
that is the problem.
|