Begin forwarded message:
A call in Wall St. Journal for imposing sales taxes on internet commerce:
http://online.wsj.com/article/portals.html
Excerpts:
Real World Needs 'Net' Taxes
May 21, 2008; Page B9
Do you think that billionaire Internet moguls should continue to
benefit from a tax loophole that hurts parks and schools, and makes
it harder for your neighborhood bookstore to keep open for business?
...
Oh, come now!For starters, there are tens of thousands of endlessly changingsales-tax rules and rates, determined by thousands of city, countyand state taxing authorities, great and small. Can you imagine thenightmare trying to keep track of how much to collect on what fromwhom to pay when to which?Additionally, half a dozen states impose NO sales taxes - Alaska,Delaware, Montana, New Hampshire and Oregon. They recognize thatsales taxes are one of the MOST REGRESSIVE - imposing the greatesttax burden on those who earn the least, who can least-afford to pay,but who must nonetheless buy goods and services.(For instance, Washington State has some of the highest taxes onsales and services. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington says,"The state of Washington has the most regressive tax structure in theU.S. It is one of only seven states that does not levy a personalincome tax. The wealthiest one percent of Washington taxpayers pay3.2% of their income in taxes. The poorest fifth of Washingtontaxpayers pay 17.6% of their income in taxes. The state also does notcollect a corporate income tax.")However, the WALL STREET JOURNAL is the newspaper of the wealthy.Thus, it's unsurprising that it would advocate regressive taxes.After all, SOMEone has to pay for the corporate welfare thatso-greatly benefits the moguls at the top.--jim
|