[IP] DHS INVITES PUBLIC COMMENT ON INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION

[David Farber <dave@farber.net>]

________________________________________
From: bobr@bobrosenberg.phoenix.az.us [bobr@bobrosenberg.phoenix.az.us]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 3:36 PM
To: David Farber
Subject: FAS:  DHS INVITES PUBLIC COMMENT ON INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION

Dave

Perhaps for I.P., assuming this item from the Federation of American Scientists
doesn't violate National Security [Harumph].

Cheers,
Bob

--
Bob Rosenberg
P.O. Box 33023
Phoenix, AZ  85067-3023
Mobile:  602-206-2856
LandLine:  602-274-3012
bob@bobrosenberg.phoenix.az.us

**************

"Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of
opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly
repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and
creates a country where everyone lives in fear."
-- President Harry S. Truman, message to Congress, August 8, 1950

**************


DHS INVITES PUBLIC COMMENT ON INFRASTRUCTURE PROTECTION

In a noteworthy contrast with the secrecy that prevails in much of
government and often within its own ranks, the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) is soliciting public comment on revisions to the
National Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP), which is the framework
for defending essential infrastructure, ranging from agriculture to
transportation, against attack or natural disaster.

     http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/2008/06/fr060608.html

The request for comment places DHS in the rather unfamiliar posture --
for a national security agency -- of actively seeking to engage public
interest and to invite public feedback on a matter of broad public
policy.

"We're hoping to get inputs from across the country," said Larry L. May
of the DHS NIPP Program Management Office in an interview today, "and
from everyone concerned with critical infrastructure protection."

Some of the NIPP policies that are under review are trivial, such as
changes in terminology.  But others are profound, such as the relative
emphasis in the Plan on "protection rather than resiliency."  Where
"protection" seeks to anticipate, deter and defend against particular
threats that are intrinsically uncertain, "resilience" focuses on
capabilities needed for rapid response and recovery from a broad range
of hazards.  They imply vastly different strategies, including public
information disclosure strategies.

Are there significant numbers of Americans who care enough about such
issues to express their views to DHS?  Apparently so.

Mr. May said that the last time DHS conducted a review of the NIPP in
2006, some 10,000 comments were submitted.

Why does DHS care what the public thinks?  Basically, Mr. May said,
"all of us are in this together, if you will."

Additional information on the NIPP, including the most recent 2006
iteration, may be found here:

     http://www.dhs.gov/nipp


_______________________________________________
Secrecy News is written by Steven Aftergood and published by the
Federation of American Scientists.

The Secrecy News Blog is at:
     http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/

To SUBSCRIBE to Secrecy News, go to:
     http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/subscribe.html

To UNSUBSCRIBE, go to
     http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/unsubscribe.html

OR email your request to saftergood@fas.org

Secrecy News is archived at:
     http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/index.html


_______________________
Steven Aftergood
Project on Government Secrecy
Federation of American Scientists
web:    www.fas.org/sgp/index.html
email:  saftergood@fas.org
voice:  (202) 454-4691









-------------------------------------------