[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: [IP] Re: We didn't need all that DRM after all??
________________________________________ From: Tony Lauck [tlauck@madriver.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 9:52 AM To: David Farber Subject: Re: [IP] Re: We didn't need all that DRM after all?? I believe there is a big difference between proprietary formats and DRM. In the U.S. it is not illegal to reverse engineer a proprietary format. It is illegal to reverse engineer encryption used for DRM. (IANAL) Tony Lauck https://www.aglauck.com > From: Peter Wayner [pcw@flyzone.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 3:36 PM > To: David Farber; bob37-2@bobf.frankston.com > Subject: Re: [IP] We didn't need all that DRM after all?? > > I'm not sure I follow this. How are Hulu or YouTube not DRMed? There's very little practical difference between a proprietary format and some encryption that calls itself DRM. -------------------------------------------
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC