[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Subject: [IP] A proposal re: An observation about Apples claims on jamming cell towers
Begin forwarded message: From: "David P. Reed" <dpreed@reed.com> Date: July 31, 2009 3:25:33 PM EDT To: dave@farber.net Cc: ip <ip@v2.listbox.com> Subject: Re: [IP] An observation about Apples claims on jamming cell towers Dave - I think it would be great for the FCC or Congress to appoint a blue-ribbon study commission on this category of claims by Apple and various cell providers, with witnesses required to testify under oath, to determine if either there is a threat to the nation that is not being treated seriously by the wireless operators, or alternatively, a tacit agreement among cellular providers and equipment suppliers to restrain trade in the independent cellphone software development industry. You would be a great chairperson of such a study commission. On 07/31/2009 01:19 PM, David Farber wrote: I would observe that unless Apple has done a remarkably sloppy job of designing a modem chip for the iPhone that the claim that jail breaking the iPhone is dangerous to cell towers raises a number of interesting questions. there are many PCs, programmable software radios, and developmental cell phones that are very open to the writing of specialized drivers. With a large number of such devices available why have we not seen cell towers collapsing all over United States. and the world. Either the hacker community has ignored this tempting target or cell system is considerably more robust than Apple claims. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [interesting-people Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC