Begin forwarded message:
I don't think the concept of
dividing things at the micro level is going to create a technique to
reduce costs. The reasoning that leads you to have 8 separate
workstations is incredibly flawed in the first place, but the same
false reasoning is being applied in MNP at the "virtual" level, which
will create huge costs in other dimensions.
If the reasons you have 8 workstations on your desk were examined more
clearly, I suspect you would find that the problem is not that they
can't run on the same network, but that the fragmentation of
information systems at the Application Level and User Level is far more
costly in terms of human lives, national treasure, etc.
That is the conversation that DoD cannot have, because it involves
personal power, not national safety.
On 10/17/2009 04:54 PM, Peter Thoenen wrote:
Thats not
what they actually want to do. What they want is a way to cut
infrastructure cost by running N physically separated networks over the
same wire and TCP/IP isn't going to allow the level of separation (i.e.
MAC at the layer 2 or 3 level) that is needed. The problem right now
if you have a massive duplication of infrastructure ... I, for example,
have eight physically separate workstations alone on my desk; the cost
to support this is insane.
-Peter
|